First of all, King argues that the laws of the segregated south are “unreasonable” and in this manner ought not be acknowledged or followed through the use of pathos. …show more content…
For example, King says,"We ought to always remember that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "lawful" and everything the Hungarian opportunity warriors did in Hungary was "illicit." It was "unlawful" to help and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. Indeed, even in this way, I am certain that, had I lived in Germany at the time, I would have helped and ameliorated my Jewish siblings." Here he sets up an intense case of a treacherous law (how it was illicit to help a Jewish individual in Germany amid Hitler's rule), and how he would have responded to it (offering help to his "Jewish siblings"). This hurls the ball once again into the clergymen's' court – inferring that they ought to consider what they would have done. It is expected that as great Christians, they would have offered help to any individual in need. He attracts a relationship to the outrages submitted against the Jews to the abominations conferred against African Americans in America – however on a much littler scale, the circumstances can be viewed as comparative, with out of line laws achieving violence and deaths. King compels the pastors to consider the ethically correct