Andrew Jackson Democracy

Words: 574
Pages: 3

All great names throughout history are closely connected with an idea; and if not, then an event. Specifically in the history of the United States: George Washington and the Revolution, Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War, Martin Luther King and Civil Rights... The list goes on. Andrew Jackson, his name, is tied closely to democracy, but is that historically fair? Historically accurate? Like any other wide angled question, it is many sided in its argumentative answers. Much like the word democracy, definitively the definition of it. What is democracy? You must pick a definition of the word, and let that definition be known, before you deem Jackson democratic, not quite or not at all; and explore that concept in doing so.

All branches and agencies of government listening and following the wishes of The People, was to Jackson, what democracy is or should be. Although no democratic philosopher, it is based off of his definition of the concept in which we should first prove him integral to or not. So first, it is important to understand who Jackson regarded or included in the phrase: “The People”. Jackson is referred to as the president of the “common man”. That common man being the white man, the white male specifically, the entrepreneurial white male whose equal protection and rights and aspirations were cut short by “higher
…show more content…
However, was his democratic revolutions, the way which in he executed them, just as devoted to democracy? A democratically elected president, his enemies argued, behaved more like a