Anne Aylor Case Essay

Words: 4623
Pages: 19
Open Document
Anne Aylor, Inc.
Determination of Planning Materiality and Tolerable Misstatement
MARKS. BEASLEY· FRANK A. BucKLEss ·STEVEN M. GLOVER· DouGLAS F. PRAWITT

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After completing and discussing this case you should be able to
[1] [2]

Determine planning materiality for an audit client Provide support for your materiality decisions

[3]

Allocate planning materiality to financial statement elements

INTRODUCTION

j--

Anne Aylor, Inc. (Anne Aylor) is a leading national specialty retailer ofhigh-qualitywomen's apparel, shoes, and accessories sold primarily under the "Anne Aylor" brand name. Anne Aylor is a highly __ recognized national brand that defin_s_a _ e dis_tin_t_ c fashion_point of v:iew.--.Anne Aylor …show more content…
78

Anne Aylor, In(.
EXHIBIT 1 Smith and Jones, PA. Polley Statement: Planning Materiality This policy statement provides general guidelines for firm personnel when establishing planning materiality and tolerable misstatement for purposes of determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures. The intent of this policy statement is not to suggest that these materiality guidelines must be followed on all audit engagements. The appropriateness of these materiality guidelines must be determined on an engagement by engagement basis, using professional judgment. Planning Materiality Guidelines Planning materiality represents the maximum, combined financial statement misstatement or omission that could occur before Influencing the decisions of reasonable individuals relying on the financial.statements. The magnitude and nature of financial statement misstatements or omissions will not have the same influence on all financial statement users. For example, a 5 percent misstatement with current assets may be more relevant for a creditor than a stockholder, while a 5 percent misstatement with net income before Income taxes may be more relevant for a stockholder ttian a creditor. Therefore, the primary consideration when determining materiality Is the expected users of the financial statements. Relevant financial statement elements and presumptions on the effect of combined misstatements or omissions that would be considered
Show More

Related Documents: Anne Aylor Case Essay

Essay on Case 7.1 Anne Aylor

Planning Materiality c a S eS inc lu de d in t hiS Se ction 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1 Anne Aylor, Inc. 229 Determination of Planning Materiality and Tolerable Misstatement ot he r c aSe S t h at diScuSS topicS related to thiS Section 5.6 Scoping and Evaluation Judgments in the Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting 12.1 EyeMax Corporation . . Evaluation of Audit Differences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sarbox…

Words 1976 - Pages 8

Scientific Method and Cs Essay

(I am generally around MWF, call ahead to confirm) 1. Course Objectives This course is an advanced course in auditing. The course materials consist primarily of professional standards (both from the AICPA and PCAOB), empirical research, and case studies on selected topics in auditing. Subject matters include the demand for auditing, the effects of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act, risk assessment, fraud, and audit testing. Students are expected to gain the following: a. An understanding of the economic…

Words 3434 - Pages 14