7
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.1 Anne Aylor, Inc.
229
Determination of Planning Materiality and Tolerable Misstatement
ot he r c aSe S t h at diScuSS topicS related to thiS Section 5.6
Scoping and Evaluation Judgments in the Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting 12.1 EyeMax Corporation . . Evaluation of Audit Differences
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sarbox Scooter, Inc.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
185
369 379
12.2 Auto Parts, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Considering Materiality When Evaluating Accounting Policies and Footnote Disclosures …show more content…
The cooperative activity called Homework Review could be used to discuss the students’ answers to requirement 2. The basic process for this activity is to have the students meet in small groups to compare and discuss their responses on the planning materiality and tolerable misstatement working papers. The tasks of explaining each response on the working papers and checking the accuracy of each explanation should be rotated among group members. After students have had the opportunity to review all their responses the instructor can randomly call on individual students to share their responses with the class. It is important for the instructor to randomly call on individual students to ensure that all students take responsibility for learning the material.
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
Relevant professional standards for this assignment are AU Section 310, “Appointment of the Independent Auditor,” AU Section 311, “Planning and Supervision,” AU Section 312, “Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit,” and AU Section 350, “Audit Sampling.”
230
instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute
case 7.1: anne aylor, inc. Q u eS ti onS and Su GG e St e d Sol ution
[1]
Review Exhibits 1 and 2; audit memos G 3, and G 4; and audit schedules G 5, G 6-1, and G 6-2. Based on your review, answer each of the following questions: