Argument Analysis: The Daily Show

Words: 1260
Pages: 6
Open Document
Comedy is one of television's most apparent categories. Hundreds of comedy shows exist on a wide platform of networks, some solely dedicated to humor and some covering a wide range of genres. However, many people criticize such programs for their offensive nature and indecency as well as their ability to influence viewers with biased viewpoints. In “The Good, The Bad, and The Daily Show”, author Jason Zinser addresses concerns and advantages regarding “fake news” given by the very satirical news program known as The Daily Show. In “Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious”, author Antonia Peacocke points out that although the show Family Guy is indeed offensive, it has certain virtues and quality humor that cannot …show more content…
To counter this argument, Jon Stewart reiterates the claim that “The Daily Show is a comedy, not a news show” (Zinzer 374). Although it uses real events, The Daily Show is simply meant to entertain. Even after putting the bias and humor aside, the program does not go into enough detail on the topics it covers to be considered a credible source of knowledge. This distinguation allows The Daily Show to carry out its role as a comedy, rather than having to direct unnecessary attention to the credibility portion of its …show more content…
After each episode airs, complaints sporadically appear on social media, publications, and even in the mailbox of creator Seth MacFarlane himself. Due to the offensive content presented in each episode, it comes as no surprise that certain groups of people feel insulted when a sensitive subject matter arises. Having been categorized as a comedy television show, Family Guy does not exist solely to offend people, but rather to entertain. Offensive content is simply what makes Family Guy an original and popular show, and without it, a void would be left to fill. The creator of the show,Seth MacFarlane, acknowledges that some material is too startling to be included in the show, as it would be deemed incredibly offensive by certain groups. However, he states that “he wants only to amuse,” and stays the course when combining culture with humor that may aggravate the masses (Peacocke 307). Both shows make it clear that the main goal is to put a smile on the viewer's’ face, and this is how they have succeeded in becoming well renowned comedy programs that continue year after
Show More

Related Documents: Argument Analysis: The Daily Show

Cody Suprak Essay

Cody Suprak Mrs. Monte ENG101 - 27076 25 March 2015 Vitamin Overload Vitamins? More like vitamouts. A lot of people believe that taking a daily multivitamin or individual supplements can increase their health and therefore extend their lives, but science has proven otherwise. In fact, science has proven almost the opposite. In most cases taking supplements can actually be detrimental to your health. Vitamins, if taken properly, can and should be used to improve health, but the possibility of overdosing…

Words 1152 - Pages 5

Essay on Caprica Energy and Its Choice

3. Fracturing fluid disposal: Argument: * Large volume of wastewater would flow back to human environment and water treatments are costly for Gas Company. * Chemicals like radiation cannot be filtered out. This threatens people’ s health. Debates: * There are multiple options to treat the wastewater. It not seems like a big deal. According to the industry opportunity analysis and risk assessment above, I suggest Caprica continue to apply the hydraulic…

Words 1014 - Pages 5

My Freshman Composition Analysis

experiences and other tools to succeed, especially the skills I obtained in Freshman Composition I. In Freshman Composition II, I thrived by meeting most of the criteria listed in the syllabus. Some of the goals that I met include quantitative analysis skills,…

Words 1502 - Pages 7

Do all parrots look same Essay

culturally very diverse country. Author covers employee detail analysis of variance of cultural diversification in four work related values and behaviors: 1.) Individualism/Collectivism 2) Power Distance 3.) Uncertainty avoidance, 4.) Masculinity/femininity. These behaviors are important to analyze as these factors impact on employee attitude, leadership principle and motivation factor which impact their decision making process. It shows importance to manager of understanding individual values and…

Words 1189 - Pages 5

Summary: Rhetorical Analysis

through this vast amount of text to find a reliable source can be daunting. Rhetorical analysis is a longstanding method to depict the validity and or shortcomings of writing. The purpose of this paper is to analyse two sources, one peer reviewed and one web searched, in order to determine which one is a better research tool. The web searched article, J. Dill, S. L. Handy and J. Pucher’s, How to Increase Bicycling for Daily Travel [1], May 2013, research brief, argues that, to increase cycling, innovative…

Words 878 - Pages 4

Rhetorical Analysis: Political Advertising

Rhetorical analysis: Political advertisements Presidential campaigns, in most cases, have been characterized by features of the competition, which has led to formulation and presentation of goals and objectives of each candidate involved. This is considered to be the most tactical activity in the political arena. Some of the major common issues addressed by presidential candidates includes poverty levels, unemployment, the economic situation and resource allocation. Standards of living in the United…

Words 1511 - Pages 7

Grimm And Recchia In Congressional Race, A Debate Is All Bark

For Grimm and Recchia in Congressional Race, a Debate Is All Bark The Democratic challenger peered into the camera, primed to deliver his closing argument in a debate colored by accusations of fraud at a health food restaurant, tussles over who is “more Staten Island” and schoolyard jabs that almost certainly sounded sharper in a given candidate’s head. “You tell me, since you know so much,” the Democrat, Domenic M. Recchia Jr., said when his opponent asked him about federal money for Hurricane Sandy relief…

Words 894 - Pages 4

Rhetorical Analysis Of Why We Can T Stop

A Rhetorical Analysis of: Why We Can’t Stop ‘Why we can’t stop’ is an article written by Leon Neyfakh that discusses one of the most popular topics in America today: distracted driving. This article specifically states the cell phone as the distracting figure while driving. Neyfakh opens his argument with an exordium, giving the audience real life circumstances to relate to today. He states that “there is a problem with treating the texting and driving threat as simply a matter of public awareness:…

Words 1164 - Pages 5

Essay about Why Walmart Is Not Fulfilling Its Responsibilities Period 1 Cam And Aren

You need three sources MINIMUM. 6. The format of the essay should be as follows: 1. First Paragraph – thesis and first best point & evidence supporting thesis 2. Second paragraph & other body paragraphs – disproving the best point of the other side’s argument and/or prove other points not made in first paragraph 3. Last Paragraph – propose a course of action in your conclusion 1. (read about “Conclusions” on the following site: http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/conclusions/ ) 7. Your group w…

Words 1360 - Pages 6

Analysis Of A Meditation On The Art Of Wu Wei

Therice Ramos Mr. Guthrie Theory of Knowledge 4 February 2015 “Arts and Letters Daily” and “The New York Times” A.) “Arts and Letters Daily” A1.) “A Meditation on the Art of Not Trying” Summary: This article is about effortlessness. According to Edward Slingerland, this art is the paradox of wu wei, which is the Chinese term “effortless action.” The article explains how many philosophers believe that the best way to carry out a task is without trying. The art of wu wei can be interpreted in many…

Words 1951 - Pages 8