First, banning books is a form of censorship or freedom of speech. Christopher M. Finnan states that, “this shocks most Americans, who rightly believe that the Bill of Rights promises us free speech. But the First Amendment did not prevent the federalists from throwing …show more content…
“The “Harry Potter” books were the most frequently challenged for several years because some people think they encourage witchcraft and magic” (Finnan 2). This evidence shows why Harry Potter has been challenged. “The study, published in the Journal of Applied Social Psychology, tested whether the novels of Harry Potter could be used as a tool for improving attitudes towards stigmatized groups. After 3 experiments in which students read passages of the books about discrimination, the students showed changed attitudes about everything from immigrants to gay students. They also claim that young children, with the help of a teacher, were able to understand that Harry’s frequent support of “mudbloods” was an allegory towards bigotry in real-life society” (Seiter 4). This evidence shows the power that the Harry Potter books can have on people, and why it’s worth reading. Overall, any book can teach and inspire people in so many