Arguments Against Animal Rights

Words: 753
Pages: 4

There are a multitude of arguments either for or against animal rights. This may come as a bit of a surprise, but the animal rights controversy has been going on for a few hundred years. This suggests that somewhere people have always thought that the way they’ve treated animals is wrong. Recently the movement has been gaining momentum. One must assume with the progression of a civilized society human beings will often seek out a new cause. The cause may appear noble to most anyone, but noble thought it may be it just won’t affect the American people on a personal level. Which is why the opposition sounds much better and animals still don’t have rights in America. If activists really wanted and,aka to have rights then they should have mAde a logical argument that the majority can get behind, the best way to do this is to ask the main questions that people ask about animal rights, why do they need them, what will it change for them, and how will this affect our society. …show more content…
These changes are they good? Are they bad? We don’t know, but we can speculate the possible outcomes that these changes bring about. For example by giving animals rights humans may no longer be able have pets because animals will have gained the rights to be independent from their former masters. Laboratories that once experimented with animals to their products safety for humans will no longer be able to hold animals against their will. And as a final example the amount of meat available to eat will plummet since animals will no longer be killed simply to satisfy human hunger because that would be an injustice and “rights” exist expressly to protect one from injustice. This is just a possibility, a few probable outcomes of the effects that animal rights could have on human society which would seem less than satisfactory to the average person, while activists would be cheering for days on