Arguments Against Libertarianism

Words: 1151

Pages: 5

Open Document

In this paper, I will defend libertarianism. Libertarianism is “the view that humans are able to make authentically free choices that are not determined by previous events in accordance with universal causal laws, that there is a meaningful sense that though we made one choice, we ‘could have done otherwise.’” (Textbook, p. 4.1) People are able to make their own choices by having the ability to exercise their free will.
I believe that all things happen for a reason and we are responsible for our own actions. All actions have a reaction, whether it is what we expect it to be or if it is the opposite of what the desired outcome should be. It is the personal version of the scientific method known as Newton’s Law “for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” This applies so much in our lives. If we had made a different choice, then something different would have happened as the result of the different choice you made. We have the ability to make our own choices daily such as what we are going to eat down to what shoes we decide to put on. Our lives are based on decisions that we have made. For instance, if a house is burning a firefighter will do everything possible to save a life. …show more content…
The thought is inconceivable to me that someone would believe that winning the lottery is determinism. You are utilizing your free will to play the lottery and press your luck at winning. It truly is the luck of the draw. It reminds me of the game bingo as it is the luck of the draw as to which number will be called. If you happen to fulfill the requirements of the game then you are the winner, if not, then you did not win and you can freely choose to play again or give up. It is your choice. The only thing predetermined about the lottery is that you have to be eighteen years old to

Free Will Research Paper

However this would be a false argument because it would then lead to argument that since it is stated that determinism is false then we could safely assert that events are not subjected to cause-and-effect, just as determinism asserts it is, which means that events in our universe must be randomly occurring which means that you would be unable to look back and understand what lead to event occurring (Libertarianism 11). If events occurred randomly or by chance then they…

Words 1200 - Pages 5

English: Free will and Soft Determinism Essay

morally responsible for. Soft determinism I had mentioned earlier is also referred to compatibilism as there are 2 opposite ideas that exist together. The first is the idea that human beings are able to exercise total free will which is known as libertarianism. The second is the idea that human beings are controlled by external forces which is known as hard determinism. The hard determinists believe that external forces control human beings, both divine and, or natural. These external forces make human…

Words 1390 - Pages 6

Freedom: Physical Determinism Essay

models offered at present are both deterministic and indeterministic, and are subject to interpretations of quantum mechanics - which themselves are being constrained by ongoing experimentation.[25] Yet even with physical indeterminism, arguments have been made against the feasibility of incompatibilist free will in that it is difficult to assign Origination (responsibility for "free" indeterministic choices). Despite our…

Words 777 - Pages 4

Natural Law Argument Against Euthanasia

Natural law theory has exerted the most enduring influence on the argument against Euthanasia, but people shall argue that in doing so it has made an unwitting accommodation with utilitarian principles. This is ironic because utilitarianism is pragmatic, calculative and inherently concerned with the short term rather than with the eternal, whereas natural law is committed to a deep metaphysical engagement with the eternal. A problem with natural law is its anti-democratic…

Words 846 - Pages 4

Classic Compatibilism Essay

Xiaokai Wang 11/19/2014 Classic Compatibilism Before the discussion of classic compatibilism, the concept of it should be clarified clearly. The compatibilism is one philosophical idea which considers that the concepts of determinism and the libertarianism can exist at the same time at some degree. According to James Shaw’s handout #10[ James Shaw, Philosophy handout 10], “compatibilists think a favored sense of "free" on which determinism does not entail that there is only one thing we can do,…

Words 1127 - Pages 5

Zwolinski's Argumentative Analysis

flaws to his arguments. For example, he states that a basic income guarantee would be a better solution than the current welfare state, however what reason would the federal government have to justify taking money from people by force? It is important to consider the moral concerns involved with theft. Although the Basic-income guarantee may be less condescending than the current welfare system, that still does not make it ethical in the first place. Zwolinski never provides an argument as to why the…

Words 829 - Pages 4

John Rawls Ideas In Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron

John Rawls and Robert Nozick are notorious for their argument over freedom and equality, which is a prevailing theme within Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron.” John Rawls argues that society is a system that should facilitate working together for mutual advantage in a socially liberal sense, while Robert Nozick believes in the libertarianism of respecting the natural rights of people, particularly in regards to ownership and property. In this section and the next, I will discuss how Rawls’ ideas set…

Words 1749 - Pages 7

Abortion: The Guttmacher Report

“Abortion takes the life of innocent human beings who are the most vulnerable in our society” (Napolitano). As of today, the people, especially women, have been taught that aborting a fetus is not murder. This is a thing that must be changed, after all, “A society that prefers death to life not only cannot prosper; it cannot survive” (Napolitano). Abortion is an overused and immoral practice that should ultimately be stopped with needed laws for the good of our country. Any two humans are…

Words 1213 - Pages 5

Amia Srinivasan Summary

earlier column about the rich and government dependency, it seems like the logical conclusion is that government usually works to strengthen existing inequalities. If that’s true, the drive toward freedom in that broader sense is an argument for free markets, not against them. Srinivasan’s second statement is not really speaking about morality, it is instead talking about legality that's simply based on a certain morality. How the statement should be read based on Nozick’s view, would be that the…

Words 806 - Pages 4

Nozick on Distributive Justice Essay

patterns provides a sound reason for rejecting patterns, or for regulating liberty. ------------------------------------------------- “Liberty upsets patterns” In his book “Anarchy, state and utopia”, Nozick provides a moral defense for Libertarianism, which is traditionally defined as “the advocacy of individual liberty,…

Words 3145 - Pages 13