P. Huemer's “ Starvin Marvin” analogy's main focus is to defend the open border while Hrishikesh Joshi's argument focuses more on selective immigration policies. In Huemer’s argument for open borders “the right to move vs. the right to exclude” he emphasizes the importance of allowing individuals to move freely across borders. Huemer challenges traditional justifications for immigration restrictions, arguing that lack of jobs and historical preservation is not enough to argue against immigration. Instead, he argues that allowing immigrants into the US could be a positive asset because it could lead to economic success and cultural improvement. Huemer uses a story called, “Starvin Marvin”. This analogy shows why it is important to allow free movement, he believes that stopping any individual from entering violates their rights because it stops them from seeking a better quality of life. Huemer argues that the benefits of allowing individuals to pursue a better life outweigh the supposed harm that immigration can