United States V. Arizona Essay

Words: 14313
Pages: 58
Open Document
United States v. Arizona: The Support Our Law Enforcement and Neighborhoods Act is Preempted and Discriminatory
Melissa Goolsarran
Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Perspective: Immigration, Discrimination, and Limitations on State Laws 3 III. Background: United States v. Arizona 9 A. S.B. 1070 and the Legislature’s Justification 10 B. The Decision: United States v. Arizona 18 IV. Analysis: S.B. 1070 is Preempted by Federal Immigration Law and Also Discriminatory 23 A. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Correctly found that S.B. 1070 is Preempted Because it Interferes with the Administration and Enforcement of Federal Immigration Laws 24 B. S.B. 1070 Discriminates on the Basis of Race or National Origin 32 V. …show more content…
This famous “Melting-Pot” has since expanded to encompass immigrants from all over the world, not just Europe. As history reveals, the United States has faced immigration concerns since its inception: from the importation of slaves, through the exclusion of Asians, to the national origin system. The recent continuous increase of illegal immigration into Arizona, however, has prompted the state legislature to pass S.B. 1070 in order to supplement federal immigration laws. Critics argue that it is preempted by federal immigration law and discriminatory against Hispanics on the basis of race and/or national origin. One must look at the intricate and codependent relationship between federal and state laws in order to determine whether S.B. 1070 is constitutional. While each individual law, whether national or state-wide, addresses a complex issue, it must also be promulgated in accordance with the Constitution. Immigration law in the United States is derived from both the Constitution and various legislative enactments. According to the Constitution, the federal government alone has the exclusive power to regulate immigration. For example, the federal government regulates “who should or should not be admitted into the country, and the conditions under which a legal entrant may remain.” Statutory laws, complementary to the Constitution, further define the federal government’s ability to set immigration policies. For instance, The
Show More

Related Documents: United States V. Arizona Essay

Compare And Contrast Ring Vs Arizona

RING vs ARIZONA Cody Hammer In 2002, Timothy Ring was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree by an Arizona jury and was sentenced to life in prison. Later, a state judge made the decision to increase the penalty to death. That death penalty sentence was upheld by the Arizona Supreme Court by looking back at Walton v. Arizona. That case affirmed the state judge’s choice to increase the penalty to death. The United States Supreme Court later granted Ring’s petition for a review of the…

Words 753 - Pages 4

Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

The Miranda v. Arizona court case has made a dramatic impact and is a very important right you have as a citizen of the United States. The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case is a Supreme Court decision. Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 ruled that an arrested individual in entitled to rights against self-incrimination and an attorney under the 5th and 6th amendments of the United States Constitution. Once the suspect is under arrest, the officer must say something similar to: “You have the right to remain…

Words 589 - Pages 3

Essay about Mexican Immigration Outline Presentation

Immigration Outline SOC305/CULTURAL DIVERSITY DR. Alex Espadas May 27, 2013 By: Jamie Burrell, Sherrelle McCloud, and Kimberly Ramirez Economic Opportunity A.Issues in the labor force with Mexican immigrants i. Hard to find good paying jobs in The United States ii.Many Mexican immigrants are low skilled iii.As the labor market changes it is causing migration back to Mexico (Portes, A. 1997). B. Many immigrants are employed in low wage, dangerous jobs i. The health of the immigrant worker is compromised…

Words 2124 - Pages 9

Essay about warrens court

Supreme Court of the United States between 1953 and 1969. The 1960s were a challenging time in the United States. America had a major concern of the Civil Rights movement that demanded and needed change. Police work and law enforcement was imbedded with individuals who took the law in their own hands based off their social and personal views. Innocent men and woman were arrested daily because of some police’s higher authority they thought they had. Supreme Court cases Miranda v. Arizona and Brown vs.…

Words 628 - Pages 3

Arizona Vs Johnson Case Summary

Arizona v. Johnson Case citation: 555 U.S. 323 (2009) 1. The Parties: • Plaintiff - State of Arizona • Defendant - Lemon Montrea Johnson • Appellant to the Arizona Court of Appeals - Lemon Montrea Johnson • Respondent to the Arizona Court of Appeals – State of Arizona • Appellant to Arizona Supreme Court – State of Arizona • Respondent to the Arizona Supreme Court– Lemon Montrea Johnson • Petitioner to the SCOTUS – State of Arizona • Respondent to the SCOTUS - Lemon…

Words 482 - Pages 2

Arizona V. Jones 132 S. 332 Case Study

Part 2: Arizona v. Gant 556 U.S. 332 and United States v. Jones 132 S.Ct. 945 The exclusionary rule forbids any use of testimony or evidence that is obtained in violation. There are four exceptions; good faith exception, attenuation doctrine, independent source doctrine and the inevitable discovery rule. This rule was established in 1914 with the Supreme Court case Weeks v. United States. The Supreme court ruled that there had been illegal evidence against Weeks. The evidence was acquired without…

Words 448 - Pages 2

SB 1070 State Policy Analysis

1070 state policy of Arizona, also known as the state ID check. This policy was made in order to maintain population control, and limit criminal activity in the state of Arizona. This policy requires each individual in the state of Arizona to carry documentation to prove they are legally residing in the United States. The SB 1070 was put into effect in April of 2010, by Governor Jan Brewer. During the year of 2010, Arizona had a population of roughly 6.4 million people, the citizens of Arizona who…

Words 762 - Pages 4

Us Supreme Court Essay

MAPP V OHIO Mapp V Ohio is a famous Supreme Court case that has affected many American lives. Police officers suspected Miss Mapp of owning a bomb in her house. The officers attempted an initial visit but failed. After that they returned with a search warrant for a bomb, police forcibly entered the residence, and conducted a search. Obscene materials have been found but no bomb. Miss Mapp was trialed and convicted for these materials. The constitutional issue of the case was whether evidence…

Words 1143 - Pages 5

Miranda Project

Fifth Amendment right violated? Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S 477 (1981), a suspect who has invoked his rights to remain silent cannot later waive that right unless he initiates the conversation and does so knowingly and willfully. Issues: The officer violated John Smiths Fifth Amendment in which states “that a person shall not be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” John Smiths Miranda right was violated as well which states “that a suspect put under arrest are protected…

Words 902 - Pages 4

Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

Miranda v. Arizona Another signature case that impacted and transformed police practices nationwide was the case of Miranda v. Arizona seen by the Warren Court. On March 13, 1963 police arrested Ernesto Miranda who was linked to the kidnapping and rape of some 18-year-old woman 10 days earlier. After being identified through a police lineup officers aggressively integrated Mr. Miranda. However, the police officers failed to inform Miranda of his Fifth Amendment right which protects against self-incrimination…

Words 433 - Pages 2