Miranda Project

Submitted By aricari
Words: 902
Pages: 4
Open Document
CCJS234
Miranda Memo Project
April 4th, 2011

To: Clifford Stoddard
Date: April 4th, 2011
RE: John Smith Murder Charges

Question Presented: When a police officer intimidates a suspect after the suspect refused to talk and asked for counsel was his Fifth Amendment right violated? Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S 477 (1981), a suspect who has invoked his rights to remain silent cannot later waive that right unless he initiates the conversation and does so knowingly and willfully.

Issues:
The officer violated John Smiths Fifth Amendment in which states “that a person shall not be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” John Smiths Miranda right was violated as well which states “that a suspect put under arrest are protected under the constitution against police interrogation and can remain silent until counsel is present.” The officers did not respect his right to remain silent until an attorney was present and initiated the conversation with the suspect in order to get a confession.

Facts:
John Smith was arrested on murder charges, after his arrest he refused to speak with the police and asked for an attorney. He was placed in a holding cell until counsel arrived. The officer and detective went to his cell before his attorney arrived and handed him a statement of the charges against him. In the statement at the top it was indicated in bold letters that he could face the death penalty, which at the time he was under the age of eighteen and was not eligible for the death penalty. The officer after handed him that stated than stated “I bet you want to talk now, huh!” The detective than stated “No, he doesn’t want to talk to us. He already asked for a lawyer and we cannot talk to him now.”
Thirty minutes later the detective returned to Smith’s cell to give him clothing, and Smith asked, “Can I still talk to you?” The detective responded, “Are you saying that you want to talk to me now?” Smith stated that he would talk and began to make incriminating statements about his part in the murder.

Discussion:
The officer and detective violated John Smiths right to remain silent until counsel was present. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S 436, 479 (1966), a person put under arrest are constitutionally protected against police interrogation and can remain silent until they speak with counsel. Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), someone who requested counsel cannot be questioned by the police unless they initiated the conversation and are fully aware of their rights. In this particular case the officers used methods of intimidation to get a confession from the suspect after it was clearly stated he did not want to talk to the officers and asked for an attorney. Based on Innis v. Rhode Island, 446 U.S. 291 (1980), in which the suspect invoked his right to counsel and was still interrogated not directly but indirectly and therefore incriminating himself. This is the same scenario as Mr. Smith excluding the fact that the officers were talking amongst themselves with the suspect in their presence.
Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 (1897), a confession or statement from a suspect acquired unwilling during a custodial interrogation. The confession the officer and detective acquired from Mr. Smith was involuntary, he was under pressure and fearful by the officers actions and should not be admissible in court.
Officers arrested suspect Collazo for murder, advised him of his Miranda rights. Mr. Collazo refused to talk to
Show More

Related Documents: Miranda Project

Herring V. United States Case Study

Herring v. United States 129 S. Ct. 695 Search & Seizure (2009) Facts: On July 7, 2004 the defendant, Bennie Dean Herring, went to the Coffee County Sheriff’s Department to recover something from his impounded truck. Herring was a familiar face to the law enforcement. While Herring was at the Department, Investigator Mark Anderson asked his warrant clerk, Sandy Pope to check for outstanding warrants for Herring. When Sandy found nothing, Anderson asked Pope to check with Sharon Morgan…

Words 1216 - Pages 5

Gault Court Case Summary

In re Gault was a milestone United States Supreme Court case that gave juveniles the “right to counsel when facing the prospect of institutionalization” and other due process rights, post arrest (Elrod & Ryder, 2014, p. 342). Fifteen year old Gerald Gault was arrested for making an offensive and lewd phone call to his neighbor, Ora Cook. Gault and his friend, Ronald Lewis were arrested after Cook called and filed a police report about the phone call. Gault was already in the juvenile justice system…

Words 480 - Pages 2

War On Drugs Summary

thrive, which may lead to an increase crime levels in the United States. Bryan Stevenson an Executive Director of Equal Justice Initiative and law professor, in his work Drug Policy, Criminal Justice and Mass Imprisonment, published in 2011, criticizes current “war on drugs” policies and discusses possible alternative methods of punishments for drug related offences. Stevenson argues that the outcome of “war on drugs” in the United States has led to an increase in prison population in the last 25…

Words 482 - Pages 2

Argumentative Essay About Immigration

Immigration has consistently been one of the most controversial topics throughout the United States. Stereotypes characterizing immigrants as criminals or inherently dangerous people have been the most predominate portrayals of immigrants. As research shows, they have continually been targeted by law enforcement and government agencies. Politicians have even gone as far as to enforce laws that specifically affect the lives of many immigrants. Recently, tensions regarding immigration have notionally…

Words 1264 - Pages 6

Research Paper

sleep.” He is one of tens of thousands of patients who either already physically benefits or could physically benefit from marijuana’s therapeutic use, yet is legally denied medical cannabis. Having been a man of the law for 40 years as a New York State judge, Reichbach understands that doctors cannot be expected to do what the law prohibits even when they know it is in the best interests of their patients (Reichbach). In addition, since marijuana increases users’ heart rates and decreases their blood…

Words 1884 - Pages 8

Abraham Lincoln Vs The Constitution

in no way condones the act of creating a dictatorship; President Lincoln’s actions of overriding the legislative and judicial branches were not necessary in the preservation of the United States because it gave the false impression of a united Union. President Lincoln was critical in the history of the United States because Lincoln acted as a dictator by ignoring the separation of powers the Constitution established. President Lincoln did many things to ignore the separation of powers laid out…

Words 929 - Pages 4

Essay on CJS111RP MP

off balance system of individual state policy and actual reduction of Domestic Violence Offenses. When people ask, “why do women stay in violent situations?”, they are placing blame on the victim. As a society, we must confront this attitude and place responsibility where it belongs — with the offenders. Background and History of Domestic Violence Annually, there are millions of adults and children who have become affected by domestic violence in the United States. Naturally Domestic Violence manifests…

Words 2821 - Pages 12

Criminal Justice System Research Paper

judge individuals by the way they look. They can arrest you without any evidence. They arrest you for small crimes and give you years in prison. Families are being affected by the police’s choice. Unfortunately, the United States criminal justice system is not effective because it has one of the highest rates of incarceration, impacts families and communities, and in addition carries out policies in unjust and discriminatory ways. The United States has one of the highest percentage of prisoners in…

Words 872 - Pages 4

Essay on Twilight: Cannabis and Marijuana

Legalizing Marijuana 08/04/2012 SOC120: Introduction to Ethics & Social Responsibility (ADO1229A) Instructor: Erin Schouten Marijuana is a never ending conflict in the United States today. Some people agree that marijuana can be used for medicinal purpooses while others see it as a drug with harmful affects. Not only is this a controversial debate, it is an expensive conflict we are having. One benefit of legalizing marijuana would be that we as a nation…

Words 1287 - Pages 6

Case Study Of Chimel V. California

B. In Chimel v. California, (1969), what limitations did the U.S. Supreme Court place on searches incident to an arrest? In the late 1960’s, Ronald M. George, a young deputy who worked for the state of California, headed to Ted Chimel’s household to serve him an arrest warrant for some burglaries which had recently taken place in the surrounding neighborhoods. Upon arrival at Chimel’s home, George found only Chimel’s wife who allowed the police to enter the home where they patiently waited for…

Words 370 - Pages 2