Case Study Of Chimel V. California

Words: 370
Pages: 2
Open Document
B. In Chimel v. California, (1969), what limitations did the U.S. Supreme Court place on searches incident to an arrest?

In the late 1960’s, Ronald M. George, a young deputy who worked for the state of California, headed to Ted Chimel’s household to serve him an arrest warrant for some burglaries which had recently taken place in the surrounding neighborhoods. Upon arrival at Chimel’s home, George found only Chimel’s wife who allowed the police to enter the home where they patiently waited for Chimel to arrive. After Chimel returned home and the police served him the warrant, George and his team began to search his property for any of the items reported missing from the burglary. The search revealed many items which were later used to convict
Show More

Related Documents: Case Study Of Chimel V. California

Chimel V. California Case Study

During this week learned about the Fourth Amendment and search and seizure. The focus was on Chimel v. California. In the Chimel vs California case chain of the police used search and seizure. Police officers on this an arrest warrant but not search warrant, was admitted to the petitioner's home by his wife, where they awaited petitioner's arrival. The Fourth Amendment carefulness necessity for a search warrant. Necessities that the warrants precisely define the place to besides the items to seized…

Words 315 - Pages 2