Chimel V. California Case Study

Words: 315
Pages: 2
Open Document
During this week learned about the Fourth Amendment and search and seizure. The focus was on Chimel v. California. In the Chimel vs California case chain of the police used search and seizure. Police officers on this an arrest warrant but not search warrant, was admitted to the petitioner's home by his wife, where they awaited petitioner's arrival. The Fourth Amendment carefulness necessity for a search warrant. Necessities that the warrants precisely define the place to besides the items to seized. The 4th Amendment to the US Constitution states the individual must be secure in their household and is there person against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated and that no warrant should be issues, but upon the probable cause,
Show More

Related Documents: Chimel V. California Case Study

Case Study Of Chimel V. California

B. In Chimel v. California, (1969), what limitations did the U.S. Supreme Court place on searches incident to an arrest? In the late 1960’s, Ronald M. George, a young deputy who worked for the state of California, headed to Ted Chimel’s household to serve him an arrest warrant for some burglaries which had recently taken place in the surrounding neighborhoods. Upon arrival at Chimel’s home, George found only Chimel’s wife who allowed the police to enter the home where they patiently waited for…

Words 370 - Pages 2