Aristotle Response Essay

Submitted By banned94
Words: 903
Pages: 4
Open Document
This text goes over many key features regarding what the three genres of rhetoric are and how to they are to be worked according to Aristotle. “Rhetoric seems to be capable of seeing what is persuasive about any given thing (Saches, 2009, pg.137).” Ethos, pathos and logos are defined as wisdom, virtue and good will. These are all three basic ways to persuade an audience according to Aristotle. Ethos is used to refer to a speaker’s character as it is delivered to the audience. Logos is the character of the speaker or the audience’s emotions they give off. For example “All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.” (web.calstatela.edu) Pathos is the emotion of the audience. The emotions angry, pity and fear and the opposites. Joe Sachs taught philosophy and law for thirty years at St John’s University in Annapolis Maryland. With the understanding of Aristotle’s physics, Sachs brings in new work in on Aristotle’s theories. Sachs translates Aristotle with words that comes to stands with concepts in everyday Greek language. Aristotle was an ancient Greek philosopher in Stagira Greece, He was born in 384 BC. Aristotle was set under Plato’s teachings at age seven. Then later on went and founded his own school where he studied teaching and writing his whole life. Aristotle defines rhetoric by being defined as the faculty of discovering in the particular case of available means of persuasion. After the assigned reading the three main ideas Anger, hatred and happiness are three ideas that stuck out to me and I found to be important. The first of my main three main ideas is Anger. Anger is a natural feeling, it reads as response to selfish challenges that is not directed at ones specific self. When people talk about family or any other emotional subject it is usually the whole family who is involved. Being angry at a group of people rather than just one person in that group. The second main idea I found to be important is hatred. Where it is targeted at ones specific self in that group of people you are angry at. In addition, the quote, “Liking someone is a desire for the good of that other person. Hostile things extend beyond anger and include a dislike of general classes of people, such as thieves and informers.” (pg. 124, chp.4) Based off what was done towards you by one’s self you can allow yourself to have hatred towards that person. Hatred in not partaking towards a crowd, and one person you can’t be angry at. Pathos is very similar to anger, when a speaker is speaking towards an audience his goal is to make the audience angry. With the audience being more than just one person. When in reveres the audience can have hatred towards the speaker for his words being presented towards the crowd. The third idea I found to be important is Happiness. “All advice about what is advantageous to a community it aims untimely at the happiness of its citizens (pg.22 Ch. 23)” For example happiness is more of a community. The community cannot be happy unless its citizens are happy. Some significates can be the election of the president. The president tries to fulfil a majority of people’s needs. For example Obama is liberal, but not everyone is liberal. All conservatives may not be happy with him. This makes the world an unhappy place because a majority of the United States population is not happy. On a smaller aspect, if one person in the courtroom is unhappy and everyone else is happy, that courtroom is a happy
Show More

Related Documents: Aristotle Response Essay

Bioethics Paper 3 Aristotle

Alexandra Koenig Father Bailey Bioethics 3 February 2015 Response to Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle In this piece by Aristotle, he begins by saying that every single act a human does aims some ‘good’ outcome. This ‘good’ can be considered to be a little arbitrary because it can either be the end goal, or the means to an end. Aristotle reasoned that we, as humans, cannot approach situations in the exact same way. He understood that mathematics and sciences could be approached to a precise end…

Words 421 - Pages 2

Stoic Virtue Analysis

According to Aristotle, virtue belongs in two categories: intellectual and moral. With intellectual virtue, this is conceptualized at birth and grows through teaching, which requires time and experience (Cahn, 2013). Whereas moral virtues ascend from us habitually by nature through adaption (Cahn, 2013). Aristotle continues that nature actions should be determined how they should be done, in order to become good or learn if an action becomes destroyed through a defect or excess of an extreme (Cahn…

Words 440 - Pages 2

Midterm Essay Guide

out and structure your essays. Obviously, Aristotle gives a lot of arguments for these claims, and so it’s your job in the essays to explain how Aristotle connects his ideas. You don't need to include all of these arguments in your essays, but you’ll need to explain some of them when they apply. Topic 1 pertains to how we cultivate good virtue and topic 2 pertains to the life of pleasure versus the life of virtue, so this guide can help you plan your responses, but merely explaining all the claims below…

Words 338 - Pages 2

Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics

In Book III of the “Nichomachean Ethics’, Aristotle proposes an extremely relevant and pertinent theory of moral responsibility. Centered on the idea of what people are and are not responsible for, based on their actions, the purpose of this investigation is to give the best response possible for Aristotle to the objection he is given at 1114b. This objection being, what if no one is responsible for their actions? If true, this objection would render his theories of character acquisition, the taxonomy…

Words 1365 - Pages 6

Aristotle's View Of Torture

unjust and if is condemned or accepted by either philosopher. We can begin by looking at Aristotle views which as describe in Book II of Nicomachean Ethics, are centered on the idea that being “happy” is the ultimate end and that in this, ultimate end is brought up by virtuous acts. Aristotle then goes on to state that a persons’ life would essentially be meaningless unless there was not a constant…

Words 1493 - Pages 6

Aristotle Virtue In The Odyssey

meaning of the word ἀρετή, first encountered in Homer's Odyssey. The basis of the formation of virtue in the life of man on the conviction of Aristotle is education and upbringing. Aristotle regards virtue as the acquired properties of the soul, dividing them into dianoethics (mental, formed by training) and ethical (moral, formed by education). According to Aristotle, the soul strives for cognition and participation in the supreme good, in this, according to the philosopher, the man's striving for the…

Words 389 - Pages 2

Comparing Nietzsche And Aristotle's Moral Views

To start, Nietzsche and Aristotle both had completely different moral views. Nietzsche’s belief went along the lines of the paradigm shift, while Aristotle’s belief was along the line of virtue of ethics. Nietzsche belief was developed and based on four key features. These features were god is dead, the superman, the will to power, and the eternal recurrence. With the first feature, it means that without God people will develop their own moral concepts based on themselves instead of God. With…

Words 413 - Pages 2

Virtue and Aristotle Essays

Aristotle: Ethics and the Virtues The Goal of Ethics Aristotle applied the same patient, careful, descriptive approach to his examination of moral philosophy in the Εθικη Νικομαχοι (Nicomachean Ethics). Here he discussed the conditions under which moral responsibility may be ascribed to individual agents, the nature of the virtues and vices involved in moral evaluation, and the methods of achieving happiness in human life. The central issue for Aristotle is the question of character or personality…

Words 2042 - Pages 9

Rhetoric Analysis

Introduction One of the most important theorists and rhetoricians of classical Greece, Aristotle, established Western philosophy's understanding of the art of persuasion with his fundamental work, "Rhetoric." According to his theory, the three main components of effective communication are pathos, which is known as the audience's emotional connection, ethos, the speaker's credibility, and logos, which is the logical argument. These components offer a strong foundation for examining the effectiveness…

Words 1657 - Pages 7

Plaisance Response Paper

PROFESSOR: Dr. Bernhard Debatin Response Paper for J8130-Ethics, Internet, and society—Fall 2014-2015 Topic: Media ethics (Plaisance) Ethics comes into our minds when we are finding rational justification for our actions. Aiming at giving his readers applicable key principles to moral philosophy and to responsible media practice, Plaisance introduces a broad collection of classical and contemporary philosophers. For example, in defining ethics, Aristotle focused on the actor; Kant emphasized…

Words 633 - Pages 3