Before Socrates Essay

Submitted By Jessieyepthatsme
Words: 1138
Pages: 5
Open Document
Jessica Anderson
Phil 1301-43002

Critical Response: Philosophy Before Socrates

Prior to Socrates, many philosophers emerged themselves in critical thinking on questions that were profound for their times. For this very reason, many philosophers turned toward personal new and innovative ways to answer their questions. To this very day, both scientists and philosophers continue to place value on the reasoning and theories that were formed by the philosophers that came before Socrates.
Thales (625-547 B.C.) was a Greek philosopher from Miletus. Aristotle referred to him as the first philosopher in Greek tradition and Bertrand Russell believed that Thales was the beginning of western philosophy. Thales has been noted to have pursued explanation of critical questions based on natural mysteries. It is for this very reason that Thales focused on the element of water and is said to have believed that all things were alive with water. Thales also believed “All things are full of gods” (Norman Melchert, 2009, p. 11). Thales belief was based on the basis of the immortality of matter and motion. I disagree with Thale’s opinions due to the fact that I believe all things do come to an end. After death energy might transfer, however I physical being does end and immortality is not true. Physical bodies decompose on earth and become nutrients to the earth.
Anaximander (612 B.C.) was another Greek philosopher who followed the teachings of Thales. Anaximander’s beliefs revolved around being “boundless” or infinite. Aristotle argued that the boundless has no origin, because itself is in fact the origin and “the boundless” would also infer that it is a beginning and a beginning does not have a beginning or end. Anaximander also studied the different aspects of the universe. He claimed that nature was ruled by laws and must be balanced. An example of this is the heat of summer balancing out evenly with the cold of winter making a never-ending cycle. I do not personally agree with Anaximander’s water theory because it does not cover the potential for fire to flourish. If everything on earth derived from water fire could not possibly survive. Fire was not only essential for survival and heat, fire was also a main weapon and essential for burning fields for crop rotations.
Xenophanes was a Greek philosopher that went against the theory of the philosophers by believing there was only one god and that this man is in no way similar to mortals. He believed the other philosopher’s views of gods as over glorified heroic human beings were wrong and emphasized that the singular god in which he believed was extremely different from the past traditional view of gods. Because Xenophanes believed in a singular elaborate god he went against the stories that other philosophers had preached. An example given in the reading was that of gods creating rainbows as a message or sign to the mortals that are grounded on earth. Xenophanes did not believe that rainbows were created by the gods and were just a natural occurrence. Although I find Xenophanes to be imaginative, I do not agree with his philosophies. Having many gods and many divinities is not something that I would ever fully consider accepting. His stories are very fable like any do not hold true logical meaning.
Heraclitus (500 B.C.) was a Greek philosopher who is most notably known for having written short riddles that contained extensive meaning. His writing focused on his personal views of mankind and the role that man has in contributing to the world in which he is a part of. He often uses symbolism of elements such as water and fire as metaphors to suggest further meaning. His most famous riddle is that no man can step in the same river twice. The reading states that Heraclitus concluded this view based on the fact that the second time a man would step in the river he would be in different waters. However, after reading his true wording of the riddle that has been altered I believe he was
Show More

Related Documents: Before Socrates Essay

Euthyphro's Dilemma Before Socrates Before Socrates

When Euthyphro visits Socrates before Socrates’ trial, the two converse over many different questions, one being the Euthyphro dilemma, which follows as, “Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” (Cooper 11). No clear and concise definition is reached from the overall conversation, ending in Euthyphro leaving in a hurry. From this question, however, I pick the first option, as it entails a more open definition in the overall situation. This…

Words 519 - Pages 3

Socrates 'Conviction Before Conformity'

Conviction Before Conformity In the “Apology,” Plato recalls the prosecution of his master, Socrates, and the arguments he uses to defend himself against accusations of exploiting the youth and not recognizing the gods of the state while at the same time creating new divinities. By the end of the trial, Socrates is convicted and sentenced to death but was given an opportunity to admit wrongdoing to avoid execution. He chose not to compromise his belief by fervently insisting that if life is not examined…

Words 1468 - Pages 6

Plato's Argument For The Immortality Of The Soul

student of Socrates to writing on his own. In this dialogue, Plato uses Socrates as a character to express his views. The dialogues start out with Socrates and Meno discussing the moral concept of ‘virtue’. Meno is a well-known aristocrat that was visiting Athens at the time. Meno was questioning Socrates if the concept of virtue could be taught? Socrates, who claims to know nothing, did not know if virtue could be taught because he did not know what virtue meant. Meno tells Socrates that Gorgias…

Words 1671 - Pages 7

Phaedo 2 Essays

famous Greek philosopher Plato, is a dialogue recounting the events and discussions of Socrates’ final moments before his sentenced death from the well-known trial recognized as The Apology. During this time, Socrates explains to his friends that acquiring knowledge comes from a recollection of things in a previous life as a way to provide comfort to his friends about his anticipated death. According to Socrates, if humans can learn anything, they must have known about what it is they are learning…

Words 626 - Pages 3

Meno's Arguement Of The Historical Socrates

Meno, Socrates is placed on a philosophical trial for what is thought to be his historical views and practices by Meno’s own character. For example, Meno questions Socrates on the ineffectiveness of his compulsion for discovery, and his persistence that definitions are essential before any other question is asked about it. Historical Socrates is known for his passion of inquiry which he believed was our duty, and within the Meno, Meno places him on trial for this belief. Questioning Socrates, and…

Words 164 - Pages 1

Essay on Theory of Recollection

discussing the Theory of Recollection, Socrates poses his stance to Simmias and Cebes. Socrates believes that the soul comes before the body in order for the recollection process to occur. Simmias raises the objection that the body and soul can be compared to an instrument being tuned. Through the reasoning of his objection, Simmias concludes that soul exists as a result of the body existing and functioning properly. After analyzing Simmias’ analogy, Socrates presents multiple objections to prove…

Words 834 - Pages 4

Crito's Argument Against Socrates

Before Socrates’ execution, Crito visits him in prison. Crito finds Socrates sleeping and is awestruck considering Socrates is facing death so how could he sleep so soundly. Upon Socrates awaking, Crito implores Socrates to escape is his impending doom. Socrates tells Crito escaping would be unjust. Crito begins his argument for escaping with a selfish argument. He states that it will be perceived by the Athenians that Socrates’ friends left him there to die. Crito furthers this argument claiming…

Words 303 - Pages 2

Socrates The Apology Analysis

by Plato, Socrates is a man on trial for impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens. In the Athenian justice system, over 500 jurors are faced with deciding Socrates’ fate. Throughout the trial Socrates uses “harm” differently than others and states that even death would not harm him. In this paper, I will argue against the claim that death can’t harm him because his argument rests on two premises that are not true. Socrates does not give an exact definition of “harm.” I believe Socrates uses “harm”…

Words 1192 - Pages 5

Knowledge In Plato's Allegory Of The Cave

knowledgeable in law. This doesn’t make either person more knowledgeable than the other. According to Socrates, knowledge is not something we learn, but a recollection of what we know. The question of Socrates’ knowledge arose when a man asked the Oracle of Delphi if there was anyone wiser than Socrates. When the oracle responded negatively, this was reported to Socrates, and he was astonished,…

Words 1176 - Pages 5

Socrates Argument Of Recollection

In Plato's Phaedo, Socrates asserts that a pure philosopher should look forward to death. One of the main reasons he says this is the belief that the soul is immortal. Upon hearing this belief Socrates' friend Cebes asks him to explain how he knows the soul is eternal. In order to do this, Socrates presents many interconnected arguments. Out of these arguments, the argument of recollection is one of the most elaborate. In order to understand Socrates' argument of recollection, we must first understand…

Words 905 - Pages 4