Beveridge Model Of Health Care

Words: 1510
Pages: 7

Response 1
According to course materials, the form of universal healthcare that a country adopts has significant impact on how the health system works, how it is funded, and how people access health services. Australia is known for having a mixed funding model as public health services are funded through taxation (e.g. Medicare) and there is an optional system of private health insurance where government incentives are provided. The United States’ healthcare system is represented through the Beveridge and Bismarck funding models. The United States have two major health care initiatives that attempt to cover their citizens; Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare is a representation based on the Beveridge model that covers people over the age of 65
…show more content…
One of their objectives is to help improve the prevention, detection and treatment of cancer throughout all health professions. This initiative was developed in order to tackle a major cause of death in Australia; cancer. The Cancer Council’s mission is to minimise the number of Australian’s diagnosed with cancer and that lose the battle to cancer. With over 43 million dollars funded by the Cancer Council for cancer research, they are tackling the national health priority head on (Cancer Council Australia, 2017). Each year, more than 50 000 Australians contact the Cancer Councils for information and advice. They offer a variety of services including; sun protection products, networks and affiliations with national and international cancer organisations, fundraising for cancer control activities, advocacy, treatment, and patient support. Cancer Council Australia also have published a National Cancer Prevention Policy that outlines specific recommendations on a national level that governments and non-governments organisations can implement to reduce the incidence of cancer. This policy addresses the issues on a national scale and the impact each category is having on Australia’s …show more content…
This policy addresses the national health priority through trying to prevent the possibility of cancer occurring with policy strategies and interventions. Additionally, the policy outlines the steps and procedures for health professionals to implement in order to reduce being diagnosed with cancer. The Cancer Council has descriptively linked the preventable risk factors to cancer and their effects. For example, they give an overview of the risk factor (e.g. tobacco), describe the impact of that risk factor and support the impact with literature. This is done in order to display the link between the risk factor and cancer and how effective interventions can and have been used to reduce the impact of a risk factor (e.g. tobacco). The screening and immunisation of cancer are addressed in the same fashion as the risk factors in order to assess, educate and minimise the impacts. The last part of each section however clearly outlines the policy priorities – the goals for each section. For example, the policy priority of tobacco is to reduce the affordability of tobacco products to reduce the amount of tobacco induced cancers. The effective interventions administered by the government due to these policies show that increasing taxes and the cost of cigarettes reduced the amount of people smoking – thus cancer cases reducing. The Cancel Council found the two main