Certain reform proposals would not only eliminate this dilemma but also give equal financial opportunity to all those who run. However, the real issue here is, does money represent our freedom of speech? The answer to that is no. Money itself is not equivalent to speech. This notion was first promoted by the Buckley v. Valeo case in which the majority of the judges agreed that limits on election spending were unconstitutional and restricted speech. Their justification for the ruling was that money facilitates speech, incentivizes speech, and therefore the giving and spending of money is an expressive activity and the curtailment of this would hinder one’s freedom of speech (Hellman