It seems that the media and politicians particularly liked to push the issue of global warming the most. They seemed to push the theory to create a new industry for more jobs, in which they give government grants to get going. If global warming does not exists then why is the government pouring billions of dollars into these projects? Given the election of Bill Clinton and Al Gore along with abroad commitments made by the Bush administration there were many policies made to spurt the growth of this industry. These issues quickly become the top priority among the agendas of the nation seemingly over night, which in our political system policy change usually is expected to happen at a slow pace. Political teachings usually teach that when a problem meets the three factors of serious, certain, and soon, then will the problem be put on the public agenda. If this is a guideline then global warming fails if not three of these criteria it does fail two of them(Rubin 2). The phenomenon that at one time was a big deal and now ceases to exist is one called “global warming.” Global warming is the theory that the average temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere increased by about 1 and half degree in the 20th century and is likely to rise another degree or so in the next century. This theory blames human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation for the main cause of this phenomenon. The theory has become under much scrutiny in the early 2000’s and as of 2001 the theory ceases to exist. The whole idea of global warming has become known as the greatest hoax to some top notch scientist. All honest accounts of Greenhouse effect warming is seeing climate conditions of the future. The assumption is often made that a “scientific consensus” exists the theory of global warming. The term “scientific consensus” refers to the measurement of the enigmatic truth. Unfortunately, that term has been used as the writer’s equivalent of anonymous source and a commonly used term “ scientist believe that.” The problem with this term is that it does not state whether or not scientists agree, disagree , or are part of a poll; therefore nothing is really well understood using this term. Some polls suggest that the majority of scientists agree that global warming is not understood enough to allow accurate policies to conform to the theory (Rubin). The evidence that has been compiled against global warming is enormous in which climatologist Tim Ball states: The argument that global warming is due to humans, known as the anthropogenic global warming theory is a deliberate fraud. I can now make that statement without fear of contradiction because a remarkable hacking of files that provided not just a smoking gun ,but an entire battery of machine guns. Someone hacked into the Climatic Research Unit based at the University of East Anglia. Phil Jones Director of CRU has acknowledged that the files are theirs. The latter are the most damaging and contain blunt information about the degree of manipulation of climate science (Ball). These documents that were obtained are a show of arrogance and deception toward the humans of the Earth. When Jones and others were confronted by other scientist to hand over there data and method of compiling this theory they responded, “We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you when your aim is to find something wrong with it?” Ever since this confrontation jones has been nowhere to be found (Spann). A study by Swiss and German scientists suggest that increasing radiation from the sun is responsible for the rise in the Earth’s temperature. The Earth is also getting hotter because the sun is burning brighter that has in the last 1,000 years, according to new studies(Rubin). Dr. Sami Solanki, the director of the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Gottingen, Germany , who