Essay about Britain in the War

Submitted By adamcollins9955
Words: 4999
Pages: 20
Open Document
AJP Taylor – Origins of the Second World War
Second Thoughts
- Austrian crisis was launched by Schusnigg, not Hitler
- Britain took the lead role in dismembering Czechoslovakia, not Hitler
- Two views of Hiter; 1) He wanted a great war for its own sake 2) He was a more rational and constructive figure; he had a coherent long term plan of an original nature which he pursued with unwavering resistance
- AJP Taylor maintains the view that Hitler had no long term plot and had no idea how he would come to power
- Hitler had no idea how he would get Germany out of the Depression, only the determination to do so; much of the recovery was natural
- Barton H. Klein stated the economic recovery was due to the return of private consumption and non-war types of investments
- Until the spring of 1936, ‘rearmament was largely a myth’ – Klein
- Clause 3 of the Italy Germany military talks intention of going to war with Britain and France with the intention of knocking out France first
- Italy insisted that they would not be ready for war by 1942 at the latest
- Hitler’s ambition for the vanquished Power to undo its defeat was a view shared by all Germany politicians recovering lost territory, restoring German predominance over central Europe and ending all restrictions on German armaments
- Wolfgang Sauer ‘ World War 1 proved that Germany could not be an independent power on a world scale and Hitler was foolish to try
- in 1936, according to Churchill, two independent estimates placed Germany rearmament expenditure at an annual rate of twelve thousand million marks the actual figure was five thousand million marks
- Klein argues that the reason German rearmament was on such a limited scale was; 1) Hitler didn’t want to reduce the Germany standard of living 2) Hitler didn’t want to make large war preparations because his concept of warfare didn’t require
-pretending to prepare for a great war was an essential part of Hitler’s political strategy and those who sounded the alarm against him (Churchill) did his work for him
- the accusations of the German government secretly accelerating naval building in 1909 left a permanent legacy of suspicion that the Germans would do it again
- in November 1934, Baldwin denied Churchill’s statement that German air strength was equal to that of Britain and was right
- German armament expenditure was actually cute down after Munich
Chapter 1- Forgotten Problem
-from the appeasers point of view, they can claim that appeasement was a wise and would have been a successful policy if it had not been for the fact that Hitler was in the grip of a madman
-‘The purpose of political activity is to provide peace and prosperity; and in this, every statesmen failed.’
Chapter 2- Legacy of the First World War
-when the Germans put forward their peace terms, their only concern was to improve their strategic position for the next war
-‘The Second World War grew out of the victories in the first and out of the way these victories were used
-The Americans had no concrete war aims, no precise territorial demands and so this made them less eager for an armistice
- The treaty was designed to provide security against a new German aggression, yet could only work with the cooperation of the German Government
- The important thing was not to prevent German aggression but to ensure it would take a peaceful form (Preparations should be taken against German grievances, not against German aggression)
-The French military preparations after 1919 were increasingly defensive
- Britain could not enforce the terms upon Germany if they simply did not agree to them the Germans had the advantage whereby they could undermine the system of security against them simply by doing nothing; by not paying reparations and by not disarming.
- Treaty of Versailles – had to be enforced, it did not enforce itself
-‘Those who have won one war find it difficult to conceive that they
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about Britain in the War

War Of 1812 In Britain: A Comparative Analysis

discussion of one soldier’s account of the war, John Gellner writes, “Great Britain Certainly fought it unwillingly… just wanting to stop or limit the fighting.” This can be understood as a common opinion of the war as during this time Britain was in conflict with Napoleon Bonaparte. A personal account of the war by the soldier P. Finan in the British army describes mostly orders and…

Words 1142 - Pages 5

Britain: War and relatively Short Period Essay

“Britain was on the brink of Revolution” Explain with reference to your studies of workers protests from 1799-1834. How far do you agree with this statement? Revolution is such a strong word to be used to describe the situation of England at that time, as it states that there must if been some sort of change in power or structure that takes place in a relatively short period of time. This can be seen in the year 1799 as it became a very significant period for Great Britain as it effectively outlawed…

Words 875 - Pages 4

Why Great Britain Won The Revolutionary War

meant war. Us Colonists have been training for this battle for 6-12 months. Although we declared our independence from Great Britain, we have not been let free. Great Britain feels as if they still have the rights to govern us. But we want to our freedom. No matter how badly we want to declare freedom, we are no match for the powerful British. They have experienced soldiers, loads of supplies, and we the underdogs have nothing. We hardly have a uniform, and none of us had experience in a war. Our…

Words 793 - Pages 4

Wwll: World War I and Great Britain Essay

Before the late nineteenth century the concept of a world war was inconceivable to many, despite tensions growing worldwide. It was in the 1800’s that policies promoting a strong devotion to one’s country, the need to hold a standing army at all times and the desire to annex as much foreign land as possible began creating feelings of superiority within European nations. These policies were a dividing factor for different countries as they became threatened by the power of one another. Most nations…

Words 1388 - Pages 6

Essay Expansion: World War I and Great Britain

our western world. Unfortunately forming the modern world through warfare. Essay 2 Why was World War One called the Great War? What were the origins of the war in Europe, and what factors forced the United States to enter the war in 1917 after three years of neutrality? World War 1 was referred to as the Great War because no other war until then had such an impact on the world. It was the first war to affect all of the major nations of Europe and the world. It took many lives and changed the lives…

Words 1395 - Pages 6

Why Did James Want To Go To War With Great Britain

was their relationship with Great Britain and France. One of the problems was that France and Great Britain were attacking U.S. sailors. Great Britain ships weren’t only attacking, but were impressing our sailors. Impressing sailors means they kidnap the sailors and force them into their navy. Also, Great Britain was giving weapons to Native Americans and telling them to attack American settlers. After all this, James' solution was to go to war with Great Britain. This was a hard decision because…

Words 277 - Pages 2

Review: Why We Shouldn T Go To War With Britain

I vote we shouldn't go to war with Britain. We shouldn't go to war because even though Britain is causing us problems that doesn't mean we have to go to war to solve them. Here are some reasons why we shouldn't go to war. If we go to war many citizens will be forced to close their ports and many Americans won't have a job. Another reason is that we are outnumbered on land and at sea. My final reason is that Americans just want more land but instead of negotiation or trade, we think that we should…

Words 671 - Pages 3

Why Did Great Britain Win The Revolutionary War Analysis

for the initiation of war were the colonists resentment towards the British thus causing the colonists desire for independence. Their victory was accredited to George Washington’s leadership and military tactics, foreign affairs with France, and the sense of freedom that the colonists wanted to obtain. Without these factors, Great Britain would have been able to defeat the thirteen colonies. In the political aspect, Great Britain at the time was struggling to pay off their war debts, so in order to…

Words 904 - Pages 4

Essay about French and Indian War: Relationship between America and Britain

The effects after the French and Indian War created an unbalanced relationship between Britain and the British colonies. The victory allowed Britain to expand their territory, but also brought Britain in great debt. Britain believed that Parliament should have more authority over the colonists and so they put in Acts to enforce their rules. The many different Acts created resentment throughout the colonies towards their mother country. The French and Indian War also had the effect on the colonies and…

Words 937 - Pages 4

How The French And Indian War Changed The Relationship Between Britain And The Colonies

and Indian War changed the relationship between Britain and the American colonies because the war allowed Britain to be more active in colonial, political and economic affairs by giving regulations and raising taxes unfairly on the colonies, which caused the colonies to change their ideology from toleration to resentment toward Britain. The French and Indian war changed the economic relationship between Britain and the American colonies because it created a war debt and caused Britain to raise taxes…

Words 428 - Pages 2