Thompson must prove if Chick-fil-a's negligence injured her, if Chick-fil-a failed to warn her of a dangerous situation, or if the condition existed for a long time and Chick-fil-a failed to notice. Thompson failed to communicate any evidence that Chick-fil-a's negligence injured her when the case first started. Thompson had told the Chick-fil-a owner that she was just trying to help her mom to the car and wasn't watching where she was going and then tripped. There must have been evidence proving negligance to the jury before the case to be proven against the defendant. Moreover, there are no evidence proven negligence against Chick-fil-a. Thompson tried to prove that there was no differentiation between the curb and the parking lot and that is why she fell. The court of appeals denied Thompson's claims against Chick-fil-a. On another note, Thompson brought to the courts attention that Rosson and Nickels acted as they were going to pay for her medical bills. She claimed she relied on the promises to pay for her surgery, but was not compensated. Thompson did not argue that Chick-fil-a owners had committed fraud, however, Thompson needed literal proof of the