-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
ASSESSMENT
To be filled by facilitator
Components | Scores | Scores | | 1 mark | 2 marks | 3 marks | 4 marks | | Completeness of case chart | Case chart is incomplete | Some of the case chart requirements are met satisfactorily. | Most of the case chart requirements are met satisfactorily. | All case chart requirements is met satisfactorily. | | Submission | On-time submission | N/A | N/A | N/A | | TOTAL | |
Synopsis
This story of …show more content…
| Claire Burroughs | General Manager | * To determine whether is it necessary to implement fully-integrated system * Then to determine either the termination or continuation of consultant’s services. |
STAGE 2
PART I: Decisions
Key player | Peter Craven | No. | Main decision | Decision criteria | Alternatives | 1. | Determine the need to establish andimplement effectiveand systematic policies in terms of objective setting, strategicplanning orcommunication. | * Productivity * Coorperative * Motivation * Morale | * Establish and install it. * Continue remain using the old system. |
Productivity = Improve the productivity of the company which can increase sales.
Coorperative = Promote better working enviroment which can lead to better communication channel.
Motivation = Motivate employees to learn and get familiar with the new system in short time.
Morale = Employees will obey and respect the company’s rules and policies.
Key player | Peter Craven and Claire Burroughs | No. | Main decision | Decision criteria | Alternatives | 1. | To determine whether is it necessary to implement fully-integrated system | * Capital * Time * Barrier * Effect | * Implement it. * Ignore and remain with old system. |
Capital = How much capital needed to implement it.
Time = How much time needed to complete it.
Barrier = What are the challenges need to be overcome to make the implementation