Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Words: 305
Pages: 2
Open Document
B. You are an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court in 1944. You have decided to uphold the appeal of Fred Korematsu in Korematsu v. United States. Give three reasons for your decision.

I would like to speak on behalf of Fred Korematsu. I would like to uphold the appeal of Mr. Fred Korematsu. The Executive Order 9066 was passed due to the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Congress give the military proper authorization to execute the evacuation of anyone that poses a threat to the United States and National Security. They were placed in relocation centers from the West Coast. These camps were isolated and were known as internment camp. There were people of Japanese, German and Italian ancestry but it more focus around mostly people
Show More

Related Documents: Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Korematsu v. United States Korematsu v. United States (1944) was a Supreme Court Case that dealt with the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066. This executive order was issued by President Franklin Roosevelt, and called that all Japanese Americans go into internment camps whether or not they were citizens. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese American who violated Executive Order 9066 by refusing to relocate during World War II. This court case ruled whether or not Executive Order 9066 was constitutional…

Words 460 - Pages 2

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, is a United States Supreme Court case that experienced a unanimous decision that ended state segregation. The case brought the beginning of the American civil rights movement. BvBoE had a 9-0 vote to end federal tolerance of segregation and “separate but equal” ways, the case declared that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” BvBoE came back to the Fourteenth Amendment which states that there is equal protection under law to all…

Words 881 - Pages 4

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Korematsu v. United States 1944 6-3 Vote In the Korematsu v. United States case, a Japanese-American man by the name of Fred Korematsu challenged the ruling of the internment of the Japanese people after Pearl Harbor. Fred Korematsu opposed the presidential Executive Order 9066 and military statutes that gave power to the military to exclude Japanese citizens from areas that were believed to be important national defense areas that Japanese spies could leak information to the Military of Japan…

Words 420 - Pages 2

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Korematsu V. US Fafard, Korematsu V. US (War Powers) Logan W. Fafard Liberty High School AP Government, 2A Korematsu v. United States was a landmark Supreme Court case that contested the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, but more specifically Civilian Exclusion order no.34. This order is what forced Fred Korematsu to be moved away from his home and moved to the closest assembly center which is where all citizens of Japanese descent of the San Leandro area…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Speech On Japanese Internment Camps

- a date which will live in infamy - the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan ("Franklin D. Roosevelt : Day of Infamy Speech-12/08/1941” Web).” Franklin Delano Roosevelt spoke these infamous words the day after the Pearl Harbor incident. This tragedy instituted great amounts of change in the opinions of the average American citizen. Anti-Japanese sentiment grew in the United States because of the attack. The receivers of the…

Words 1070 - Pages 5

Government: First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Navigation Privileges Precedent Essay

Alexys Allen August 1, 2014 Part Three: Court Cases 1. Marbury v. Madison(1803): Designated as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia the last minute appointment were never fully finalized Precedent: when the constitution conflicts with an act of the legislature that act is invalidated established the supreme courts power of judicial law 2. McCulloch v. Maryland(1819): The state of Maryland passed legislation to impose lanes on the bank, McCulloch the cashier, of Baltimore…

Words 3075 - Pages 13

Civil Liberties And The War On Terrorism

Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus. Additionally, dissidents were imprisoned for criticizing the way the government was fighting the war. There is no evidence that this aided the fighting of the Civil War in any way. Ultimately, the United States Supreme Court declared unconstitutional Lincoln’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus.2 During World War I, the government aggressively prosecuted critics of the war. One man went to jail for ten years for circulating a leaflet arguing that…

Words 8949 - Pages 36