excess was not the “proximate cause” of the injuries to the plaintiff or the death of her husband. They would have to prove that Mr. Daniels had no knowledge that Mr. Hard was visibly intoxicated at the time Mr. Daniels served him his last drink. The plaintiff would have to prove that Mr. Daniels “did have” actual knowledge that Mr. Hard was intoxicated and that his actions as a result of being intoxicated were “foreseeable” and that the actions of Mr. Hard were the proximate cause of same. In…
Words 2714 - Pages 11
prudent person would exercise in like circumstances. The area of tort law known as negligence involves harm caused by carelessness of another.” According to Elements of a Negligence Case “injury.findlaw.com, “when someone acts in a careless way and causes an injury to another person, under the legal principle of ‘negligence’ the careless person will be legally liable for any resulting harm. “ When an injured person (plaintiff) believes that his or her injury was caused by the carelessness of another…
Words 1605 - Pages 7
The employer failed to exercise the proper degree of care and hired an unfit employee. 3. A coworker or another third party was harmed by the unfit employee. 4. The employer’s failure to exercise the proper degree of care in hiring was the proximate cause of the harm or injury that occurred (Walsh, 2014). The significance of negligent hiring is that it extends the liability of an employee’s actions outside the scope of their employment to the employer if carless hiring of an unfit employee was…
Words 573 - Pages 3
decided it was time to take matters into their own hands. A prime example of proximate disobedience : they were affected by it at the place they took action and at the time at which they took action. Not only was the situation current, but French citizens also put forth a plan, they clearly identified what was making them unhappy (the cause of their revolution) and then came up with a solution that addressed the cause of their…
Words 661 - Pages 3
Part 1 of 6 - Human food choices Observation: Modern humans consume large amounts of candy and sugary soft drinks, despite the fact that there are clear negative consequences to this behavior, such as tooth decay and obesity. Question: Why do modern humans consume these foods? The following are hypotheses that represent possible answers to this question. Each one best fits into the category of one of Tinbergen's four questions. For each, indicate which of Tinbergen's questions it is about by typing…
Words 1526 - Pages 7
salaries) and was something that had happened before (although only pigeons had been fried in the past). Negligence is when someone acts in a careless way and causes another individual to get injured. Under this law, negligence cases must demonstration the defendant’s carelessness caused harm to the plaintiff. Even if negligence is…
Words 805 - Pages 4
intoxicated patron is still the proximate cause of an injury if the injury is a natural or probable consequence which in light of the circumstance should have been foreseeable. Basically served to Intoxification and patron does an intentional act that the server/bar would have foreseen it.. The plaintiff ask this court to not allow that the motion summary of judgment to go forward and not grant it as, Mr. Hard has the reputation of driving while drunk ,would cause a car accident when served beyond…
Words 1771 - Pages 8
. Jill has legal sufficient jurisdictional grounds over both Tom and Sand Transportation. To begin, Jill has jurisdictional grounds over both Tom and Sand Transpiration because of sufficient minimum contact Tom, an employee of Sand Transportation, had in the state of Pennsylvania while driving to his destination. The long arm statues make it possible for PA to obtain in personam jurisdiction over Tom even if he has left the state. 2.Tom and Sand Transportation are able to move this case to the federal…
Words 811 - Pages 4
Torts Outline #1 Thomas Goodwyn 30 November 2012 INTENTIONAL TORTS TO PLAINTIFF’S PERSON Battery – § 18(1) Intentionally (2) harmful or offensive contact (3) causation Harmful contact – causes physical damage or injury Offensive contact – it offends a reasonable sense of personal dignity Physical Contact to person isn’t required Anything connected to the P’s person is viewed as part of the P’s person Morgan v. Loyacomo alleged shoplifter- contact with P’s body not required=L Leichtman v. Madden…
Words 5000 - Pages 20
Ebook Chapter 2 Legal Issues: Specific questions raised by the facts. "Slip and fall" is a term used for a personal injury case in which a person slips or trips and is injured on someone else's property. In most cases, a person injured in a slip and fall on someone else's property must prove that the cause of the accident was a "dangerous condition," and that the owner or possessor of the property knew of the dangerous condition. Cause of action: negligence. ANNA LOCACIO,…
Words 208 - Pages 1