Analyze how each has changed healthcare delivery on both the macro and micro levels. Provide specific examples of how both macro and micro impacts/changes: (a) Managed care and (b) Total quality improvement.
On a micro level, although many Americans say they're satisfied with healthcare and healthcare plans, they still worry about the future. Teixeira (2005) states that they are worried "about treatment that could be denied them, about costs that could ruin them, and about loss of coverage." Healthcare reform is …show more content…
There may be useful benefits to adjust organs that have broken down, in the way that an animal can grow a new limb. In the same way, it would be valuable for scientists to develop a way for the body to regenerate rather than rely on genetic engineering and human manipulation. Humans, to date, have not rectified the ethical challenges where conservative sectors are adverse to said operations due to religious doctrine, and philosophers dealing with the ethics may find issue with a polarized population. The biggest debate is whether or not the "embryo" used for stem cell research constitutes a human life (Green, 2004). While some believe embryos, including those developed ex vivo, comprise a human life, there are others that believe embryos can be developed and destroyed specifically for clinical studies (2004).
Taken purely from a science perspective, there is a lot of opportunity for expansion and if there were less concern with ethics and more money to support the research, there could really be more developments than are now considered. What bothers some people is that a select few are "playing God." Rick Weiss (2003) reviewed a report indicating that there were more than 400,000 human embryos frozen in U.S. fertility clinics. The controversy comes in determining what the definition of "life" is. Are they, and the stem cells, alive? Many feel that the law of natural selection and allowing nature to run the business of genetic is the appropriate direction, whereas