Coke: Pepsico and Market Share Essay

Submitted By wamatanon
Words: 1095
Pages: 5
Open Document
1. Despite the inextricable coordination between concentrate producers and bottlers, having been analysed through Porter’s competitive forces, they have shared not only similarities but also differences, which subsequently lead the concentrate business to be highly profitable compared to bottlers.
New entrants: In spite of the low capital requirement for entry to the concentrate industry, new entrants would need an immense amount of capital investment to overcome the marketing and pricing wars of existing established brands. Moreover, due to the franchisee agreement with bottlers, it would make new concentrate manufacturers more difficult to find effective distribution channels. On the other hand, the bottling industry requires intensive investment in its high-cost specialised machinery to lower the variable costs through economies of scale. Besides, the strong relationship between existing bottlers and regional retailers is one of the biggest barriers deterring new bottlers to enter the industry.
Suppliers: As concentrate producers require basic commodities for which there are a large number of suppliers with low switching costs, concentrate suppliers have less bargaining power over pricing. In contrast, suppliers of bottlers are established concentrate producers. With fewer active concentrate producers compared to bottlers and more value-added brand of concentrate producers, bottlers who have no branded value would have no negotiation power to their contracts with concentrate manufacturers
Buyers: Since concentrate and bottling businesses share their promotional and advertising costs, they try to increase the sales in retail channels which have different bargaining power over them. While selling through vending does not experience any bargaining power because of its direct serve to customer, food store buyers, due to the limited visible premium space, have a significant bargaining power over concentrate and bottling companies by offering the lower price to them.
Rivalry: The concentrate industry structure can be categorized as duopoly competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola since only two firms command more than 65.7% of the U.S. soft drink case market shares from 1985 onwards (Exhibit 2). The big two competed intensively to each other through advertising, differentiation and pricing over the years. On the other side, the structure of bottling industry is classified as the perfect competition due to the large number of competitive firms and the homogeneity of products, which cause firms in the industry employ pricing strategies to survive.
Substitutes: Owing to the growing health concern debates and low customer switching costs, it is undeniable that alternative beverages, sports drinks, juices, coffee, tea and mineral water, have been playing a substitute role for soft drinks at the time. Bottlers however face the less threat of substitutes. The only threat for bottlers is the sale through soda fountains, in which the concentrate producers can bypass the bottlers and supply directly to those outlets.
According to the competitive forces analysis and financial structure (Table A), it is not surprising that the whole industry is very profitable, and, especially high in concentrate business. Playing the supplier role for bottlers, who compete in a more competitive industry, concentrate producers have much more bargaining power in line with their valuable brands. Moreover, because of intensive investment in specialised equipment with high switching costs and specific materials like plastics and aluminium, bottlers’ operational costs are much higher in both fixed and variable costs while concentrate producers, who require lower costs, can emphasize on marketing and advertising competition and maintain their high margin of profits regardless of the fluctuation of commodity prices.
2. Initial competition between the two Cola giants was in the form of a pricing war. With Coke’s first mover advantage, which already
Show More

Related Documents: Coke: Pepsico and Market Share Essay

Medicare: Coca-cola and Value Proposition Essay

impossible for it to be dominated by only one company. As a result, PepsiCo who vies for the "throat share" in world's CSD industry tries to differentiate its product in order to satisfy the customers' tastes and desires. Pepsi Max is one of the drinks introduced by PepsiCo into the CSD, offering greater flavour and at the same time zero calories. Pepsi Max experienced a number of challenges after it was introduced into the market which will be discussed in the report. The pivot of this report is…

Words 5150 - Pages 21

Essay about Pepsico vs. Coca-Cola

PepsiCo vs. Coca-Cola – A Financial Comparison June 13, 2007 AC550 May 2007 Executive Summary The purpose of this comparative analysis is to provide a summary of financial and accounting information to a potential investor who is looking to invest in either Coca-Cola or PepsiCo. This research will cover some facts from the financial statements of both companies for the year of 2004. There are many factors to review when comparing these two companies. They are two of the top manufacturers…

Words 3682 - Pages 15

Pepsi: Coca-cola and Pepsi Essay

supermarkets, retailers, street vendors and store owners. Coke has millions of these partners in the more than 200 countries where it operates. This means that whenever anybody wants Coca-Cola they never have to go far to get it. Coke doesn't only provide the beverages, it also links its website to the iTunes site and give away millions of free music downloads. Coca-Cola offers a high quality of Coca-Cola's products and a very large product mix. It markets four of the world's top five soft drink brands and…

Words 2240 - Pages 9

Essay on Questions 4 6 Assignment 3 Per Angela Williams

financial analysis for each company that highlights the key characteristics for investment and how this may impact an investor’s decision. Both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have been in the business for a long time but are they competitive enough that financially one is doing better than the other. Coca Cola global products are 100% soft drinks and beverage, while PepsiCo global is both 48% snacks and 52% beverage corporation. Both companies have been operating from more than a century, but Coca-Cola is known…

Words 1101 - Pages 5

Pepsi VS Coke Essay

Pepsi and Coke increased 3% per year from 1970 to 2000. The growth was due to many factors but the main reason was the introduction of diet and other flavors. The growing economy and pricing strategies. b. Update the profitability....what has happened to Coke and Pepsi since 2006? Use evidence from their annual reports dated 2012. (10 points) Coke and Pepsi has continued to see growth over all. Coke has increased their market share over Pepsi in the beverage market. Coke is only in…

Words 577 - Pages 3

Coca-Cola vs Pepsi Essay

In response to Pepsi's challenge, Coke did its own taste tests and found out that Pepsi was preferred. This led Coca-Cola to do the one thing a leader should never do – change a product people consume a lot of. The new formula was introduced to the entire market without any test marketing. Now the "real thing" was no longer the real thing; and in one stroke, Coca-Cola had undermined its own position. The "New Coke" led to an outburst from the public with…

Words 3841 - Pages 16

BA 462 Final Paper

organization project: PepsiCo Industry analysis Market Overview PepsiCo is operating in the food and beverage industry. PepsiCo merged with Pepsi and is the parent company that owns a variety of other companies such as, Frito Lay, Quakers, and ocean spray just to name a few. Pepsi alone is considered to be in the soft drink industry. (The PBG Inc. 2013). In accordance to Kpmg LLP, PepsiCo's operations are organized into four business units: PepsiCo Americas Foods (PAF), PepsiCo Americas Beverages…

Words 5034 - Pages 21

The Coca-Cola Company Essay

University College There are many global corporations that market and sell their products all over the world but very few companies are globalized like The Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Company is the envy of all companies that seek the globalization of their products and brands. Coke can be found in almost every country in the world and is bottled in over 200 countries, essentially people can find Coke products and brands anywhere in the world ("How many countries sell Coca€‘Cola…

Words 3374 - Pages 14

Accounting 540, Investment Analysis Essay

carbonated and non-carbonated drinks such as soft drinks, juices and juice drinks, ready-to-drink teas and coffee drinks, isotonic sports drinks, bottled water and enhanced waters. PepsiCo operates in four major fields. These fields include: PepsiCo Americas Beverages, PepsiCo Americas Foods, based in America PepsiCo Europe, and PepsiCo Asia, Middle East and Africa. The Pepsi-Cola Company is the world’s second largest beverage company. Pepsi-Cola beverages are available in about 170 countries. The product…

Words 3625 - Pages 15

Essay on competitive strategies

than any other product. On the other hand, Pepsi is one of the main competitors of Coca- Cola. Determine how each corporate culture differs from other. PepsiCo provides best opportunities, and responsibility along with a culture, which supports creativity, as well as direct communication with top-level employee, says single insider. PepsiCo insist professional corporate environment in which employee are free of pursing their goal without "burden of the excessive structure.” Diversity has been…

Words 821 - Pages 4