Even though both of their perspectives on governing are equally admired. The amount of authority, each view a government should have set these two views apart. Both Hobbes and Locke reject Bossuet’s view on Devine Rights. Both of them set two different versions of a social contract. They both agreed on the origin of a government. They both view that the world before government, was a state of nature. Or as Hobbes’ views it the state of war (bellum omnium contra omnes).Life in the state of nature was solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short. Hobbes belief, on human nature was similar from John Calvin’s view. He(John Calvin) said “that man …show more content…
Thomas Jefferson wrote the declaration of independence by the influence from John Locke. Locke wrote the Two Treaties of Government published 1689 writing in defense of Philosophical Biblical Constitutionalism. He believed that God gave Adam (from the Genesis) natural rights thus meaning he gave everyone natural rights also. Natural rights included life,liberty & property. Locke viewed that if the government wasn't able to protect them from that they had the right to revolt against them. Yet again to understand Locke’s views one must understand the historical background. Locke wrote on the Glorious Revolution. The Glorious revolution was when a group of England’s landed elite(parliament) invited William the III and James the seconds daughter Mary to rule over England. Since the people of England weren't satisfied with their king since he immediately demanded the repeal of Test act. Also this king was Catholic and even though he permitted free worshiped the people weren't satisfied with this. So the people in power(the parliament) decided to rebel against this since James II clearly hadn't learn from the Civil War what would happen to a greedy king like Charles the