Introduction
The trial of child offenders who have committed extreme crimes as adults is still in contest as the laws that were voted and passed in areas such as California completely differ from the view of many scientific reports which state that children and adolescents have either undeveloped or developing brains thus cannot be tried as adults in any criminal justice firm.
Major characters
Children in contrast to adults in crime punishment
Young children under 18 years of age (juveniles) are given life sentences for serious crimes but there, the juvenile is not forever locked up and forgotten as it is supposed, opposite to what the adult get in life sentence meaning. Life sentence means that ones’ whole …show more content…
Besides, in 2005 a court ruling determined that it is was unconstitutional to execute a person under the age of eighteen years. Dissimilar to the Proposition 21, the court considered that children lack careful and similar evaluation as well as judgments as well as theability control sudden and spontaneous inclination in mind development (L. Grigorenko, L. Grigorenko and University, …show more content…
Proposition 21 in contrast to 707(b)
People in California voted and passed Proposition 21 allowing juveniles as young as fourteen years, as long as they are accused of serious crimes are to be tried at law courts as adults, and only at the discretion of the District Attorney this makes the law be different from 707(b) hearing where juveniles accused of committing serious crimes were to be heard before a judge to determine if the case met the criteria to be tried as an adult (L. Grigorenko, L. Grigorenko and University, n.d.).
Extreme violence in contrast to petty crimes
Unlike, before the introduction of the Proposition 21 and 707(b) laws, juveniles were only tried as adults on extreme cases of violence (HOGG HAUGHT, n.d.).
L.A. Times newspaper article in comparison with University of San Francisco’s Center for Law and Global Justice
There are 2,387 juvenile offenders that have been given life sentences here in the United States. This is according to University of San Francisco’s Center for Law and Global Justice. similarly, to a L.A. Times newspaper article which also quantifies the same numbers (G. Savage,