Contract Vs Stark Law Case

Words: 1456
Pages: 6

You have asked me to analyze the contract under Stark Law and advise her whether or not the contract should go to your CEO for signature. This is a proposed lease agreement between Paul Sherman Medical Center and Nemo & Dory Medical Associates, P.C. What forms the lease agreement not being in compliance in Stark Law? You have tasked me to make recommendations regarding the contract.
Issue statement Does the contract, under the Stark law, Provide the following: if whether the lease is compliant with the Stark Law; 2) what, if any, provisions under the lease needs to be revised; and 3) any additional facts or documentation you would advise your Medical Center to confirm or gather before the lease is executed. Should the contract go to the CEO for signature?

Facts of the case
The lease of this contract is on November 8th 2014 between Paul Sherman Medical Center, Inc.
…show more content…
Under the guidance of the Stark Law, this is appropriate as it does set a rental agreement for which is “set in advance”. The only information from the lease that needs to be revised is the automatic 1-year extension of the lease when the agreement has expired. There must be a there must be after the 1-year lease, a holdover month-to-month rental for up to 6 months after the expiration of the agreement. It should not automatically renew. As a professional recommendation, before the actual market for the lease agreement is reached he parties should ensure that the rental amount is consistent with the fair market value for the space prior to executing the lease agreement. As the CEO, there should be an opinion from an independent and qualified appraiser that will be adequate evidence to comply with both federal and state laws. The CEO should sign the lease agreement the stipulations are