Courtroom Work Group Essay

Words: 1433
Pages: 6
Open Document
Courtroom Work Group
There are many parts of the courtroom and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Counsel and the Prosecution. They work together to reach a result, in the case by staying in contact on a daily basis. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will …show more content…
Most prosecutors will not take a case unless there is a substantial amount of evidence to ensure a conviction. If the crime is a minor offense, and the suspects admit guilt, the prosecutor will impose the fine ("American Bar Association", 2014).
The criteria for taking a case has to be a fair balance between doing a proper investigation to ensure you have enough evidence to prosecute and making sure the courts are not overwhelmed with cases that should never be pursued. Making the criteria more stringent would possibly benefit the criminal by prosecutors and police having to produce too much evidence in order to go to trial. Making the criteria less stringent would overwhelm the court system with too many cases and cost the tax payer and put a burden on the state trial budget.

The Criminal Justice Funnel Our justice system is sometimes referred to as “Assembly line justice." The case load of a typical judge is so overwhelming that the judge does not have the ability to give the necessary amount of time to each defendant that comes before the court. This is the origin of the funnel effect in our criminal justice system. Every day we see traffic stops, citations, and arrests being made, but not all of them spend a significant amount of time in our criminal justice system. As these cases move along, many are eliminated through fines or plea deals. Plea deals allow the courts to free up the
Show More

Related Documents: Courtroom Work Group Essay

The Role Of The Courtroom Work Group

A courtroom work group is considered to be a non-formal arrangement that is help between a criminal prosecutor, a criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. The courtroom work group works together interactively on a daily basis. The way they do this is by making sure that all of the groups are following the rules. They also want to make sure that all of the rules that are followed in each group are followed within a timely manner. The role of the prosecutor is to make sure the government…

Words 313 - Pages 2

Essay on Courtroom Players Response

Courtroom Players Response By Jessie Davis What is considered to be a courtroom work group? A courtroom group is made up by a Prosecutor criminal defense attorney and judicial officer. How does this courtroom work group interact on a daily basis? A prosecutor is a representative who is responsible for presenting a case an individual who is accused of a crime in criminal court. A criminal defense attorney is a lawyer responsible for representing a company or person being charged for criminal acts…

Words 448 - Pages 2

Courtroom Players Essay

Courtroom Players Response Joann Ferrell AAEW1DNF68 September 19, 2014 Travis Coldwell Courtroom Players Response Schmalleger (2013) uses this as to define what a courtroom work group is, “The professional courtroom actors, including judges, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others who earn a living serving the court. Masters (2013) explains, “A body of other individuals may provide services to the court, for examples, Interpreters, Social Workers, Probation Officers…

Words 354 - Pages 2

Courtroom Players Response Essay

Courtroom Players Response Rebecca James CJS/200 March 22, 2015 Richard Daniels The courtroom work group consists of professional groups actors that are made up of judges, prosecuting attorney, defense attorney, public defenders, and others who earn a living serving the court. The courtroom work groups interact well on a daily basis. They treat one another with dignity and respect. They give one another a chance to hear each other plea out and diplomatically discuss legal matters by follow the laws…

Words 321 - Pages 2

Plea Bargaining In Court Cases

efficiency they must work in cooperation with one another. The courtroom workgroup holds meetings outside of the public eye, and together they negotiate a plea bargain with a sentence attached without a trial, thereby saving time and expediting the court process. Some critics argue that plea bargaining is unconstitutional because it assumes the defendant is guilty, but with over 90% of cases disposed of through plea bargaining, the practice is not likely to cease any time soon. The courtroom workgroup all…

Words 438 - Pages 2

Virtues Of Justice In America Research Paper

virtue of justice exists in every realm of American society. In government, America has different branches of powers to maintain the common good for the citizens of Americans. These branches work as a group, keeping a check and balances mantra, to keep one branch from having too much power. In the courtroom, Americans have judges and juries to keep…

Words 292 - Pages 2

Exposing Racial Inequality In The Criminal Justice System

Inequality in the Criminal Justice System by Grace Aina. The criminal justice system has been affected by racial inequality, which places a negative impact on people of color that leads to an endless chain of discrimination and injustice in the courtroom. Despite the presumption that everyone should be sentenced equally based on the severity of the crime, without facing any discrimination. Studies have shown that people of color or nonwhites are sentenced more severely than a white individual that…

Words 1011 - Pages 5

Courtoom Essay

there to gawk with no sincere interest; but feeling that way was not necessary, the trial was open to the public. I took the elevators to the 8th floor, Judge Nancy G. Edmunds, Courtroom 858. Arriving too early that day was actually a good thing; it gave me time to walk around the 8th floor before entering the actual courtroom. I walked the halls, stopping to really look at the pictures that were chosen to be hanging on the walls. They reminded me of the kind of pictures I would expect to see hanging…

Words 6864 - Pages 28

Aristotle Response Essay

audience. The emotions angry, pity and fear and the opposites. Joe Sachs taught philosophy and law for thirty years at St John’s University in Annapolis Maryland. With the understanding of Aristotle’s physics, Sachs brings in new work in on Aristotle’s theories. Sachs translates Aristotle with words that comes to stands with concepts in everyday Greek language. Aristotle was an ancient Greek philosopher in Stagira Greece, He was born in 384 BC. Aristotle was set under Plato’s teachings…

Words 903 - Pages 4

Prosecutor Services

The prosecutor always works in the interest of public when carrying out a prosecution of criminal and do not operate on victims or of the victims’ families behalf in the similar way as additional lawyers act for their clients. However Prosecutors are forever mindful of the outcomes for the victim, and take suitable cognizance of views expressed by the victim or the families of victim with respect to any major decision involved with the proceedings. Prosecutors make certain that the victim has an…

Words 501 - Pages 3