The key concept for the reader and the possible tipping point for the Supreme Court’s ruling lies within the concept of how race was used in the selection process and how the desired results were measured. In the article written by Jonathan Morris, he clearly explains these concepts and relates them back to a proceeding case decision in the 1978; Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. The decision ruled that the use of a quota in the admissions process was unconstitutional because it removed minorities from competition with non-minority applicants and thereby discriminated against non-minorities. Caplan failed to identify this key concept and its affect on the ruling of the case.
Morris speaks to both sides of the case and the merits behind upholding the 2003 Supreme Court’s ruling in today’s society. It is evident Morris understands the intent of the 2003 Supreme Court’s decision in a race conscious society and ending affirmative action too early could erase the gains that have been achieved thus far. However he advocates, should the U.S. reach a post-race society, these measures would not be needed and even suggests