To apply this premise today brings into question that for each man there can be a different definition of happiness. For some it is a life of service, others a life with love, for others it is about acquisition of wealth and things, and finally a life dedicated to knowledge/intelligence. According to Aristotle, lives of pleasure, politics, and contemplation, as they contribute to ‘good,’ …show more content…
The true thing about the evil figures of recent history from Hitler to Osama Bin Laden is that nobody is going out there and saying they are bad or evil. There have been many who have supported their actions. And still, to this day, some cannot see that what these men had done was inspired by anything that was bad/evil.
The mark of the truest evil is someone who is doing bad things while having the ability to convince others that their intentions are pure and honest and the best thing they can do for their people. You don’t really see anyone going out there declaring their intentions to be evil or to do evil. The true villain sees himself as the hero, but to me the true sense of a good person is to take those hateful things that happen to you against your will and use them as a motivation to move forward. I think if someone can truly rise above what Plato qualifies as the recipe for bad than that person can become a great