Democracy During The Cold War

Words: 864
Pages: 4

1. Fukuyama describes the four common principles/ goals of neoconservatism to be, an overall push for democracy throughout the world in order to improve human rights through the domestic politics of individual states; to use the power of the U.S. to solve moral issues; to solve security issues abroad due to the Neoconservatives being skeptical that other international institutions may not do so as a result of the fact that their institutions are so different from our own, especially in law; and lastly, to move beyond social engineering because it results in consequences that are often unanticipated.
The Cold War influenced this perspective because it initiated the idea that any totalitarian regime was lacking a central nervous system and
…show more content…
The Neoconservatives were too optimistic thinking that everyone wants democracy. They believed that democracy was the only way to improve human rights, yet the democracy that was put into place, was lacking serious revisions for the long term. Democracy cannot take place overnight. The aftermath of the Cold War left a precipice of ideology for the Neoconservatives that ultimately made them underestimate the situation of Iraq. This failure according to Fukuyama is a main reason for the return to …show more content…
This would mean that the governments in the U.N. may band together to impose sanctions on the government(s) that flat out refuse to meet the U.N.’s guidelines regarding consumption and production patterns in order to create a more sustainable world environment. The U.N. would most likely be forced to use power in other ways, like containment, instead of placing boots on the ground, because as we learned from the chapter on the Koreas, the U.N. placing boots on the ground is unlikely to happen