Descartes Proof Of God

Words: 1002

Pages: 5

Open Document

TERM PAPER
PHIL 1301
Prepared by
Zainab Ahmed
Presented to
Professor Normand Theriault
February 22, 2017

Section I: Cartesian Proofs of God
Descartes posits two distinct but related proofs of God’s existence. The first is commonly known as the ontological argument, the simplest version of which would more or less boil down to: (major premise) We have an idea of God, (minor premise) our idea of God includes His necessary and eternal existence, (conclusion) therefore God does exist, necessarily and eternally (Principles of Philosophy Part I, 14). The second argument Descartes posits is a bit more complicated, at least inasmuch as it involves a great number of operations. In Descartes’ second proof, he reasons similarly to the Scholastics, and finds that (major premise) we have an idea of God, (minor premise) ideas, like all other things, depend on a cause, (2nd minor premise) causes are necessarily greater …show more content…
In his third meditation (related to his second proof of God as expressed in Section I above), Descartes entertains the idea of himself causing himself, rightly decides that this is not the case, but not because self-causation is absurd and impossible, but simply because “I myself would be God! …but I observe no such power [of self causation in me, therefore I am not God]” (Classics of Western Philosophy, p. 501). This is an unspoken assumption of his, that God causes Himself, and is nonsensical. Feser explains how this proof subsequently unravels, given that “the way he gets to his conclusion is by way of the idea that there is and must be something that causes itself, only it cannot be you, me, or any other non-divine thing but has to be God” (Descartes’ “Preservation” Argument, § 14). These departures from Scholastic axioms and awareness are Descartes’ ultimate undoing, rendering his system unstable and his proofs

Essay on Philosophy 01

Khalia Adams Philosophy Exam 3 Descartes/Marx 1. Describe in detail Descartes two proofs for God’s existence. Plus give the two definitions to clear and distinct. Descartes have two proofs for God’s existence. The first proof of God existence is Ontological proof. This is not original proof from Descartes; this is taken from St. Anselm, a 12th century philosopher. Ontological proof is the idea of God signifies a perfect being. The very idea of perfection…

Words 1077 - Pages 5

Rene Descartes First Meditation Research Paper

m Paper The reconstruction of God’s role at the end of first meditation would be to perhaps eliminate him all at once or to rethink what we find doubts in. Throughout Descartes first meditation, doubt is used as a weapon to question everything you’ve thought or known to be true. The skepticism will lead to endless possibilities, however if we change our perception of our doubts, as a result everything that ever had certainty would have an entire new meaning. Not necessarily discrediting the existence…

Words 1246 - Pages 5

Descartes Proof Of God's Existence

premise 6 assuming that Descartes’ argument works in proving gods existence that “therefore, God exist”. The Cartesian circle claims that the criterion of clear and distinct perception depends on the assumption that God exists, and since Descartes didn’t establish god existence. Descartes cannot know that his proof of gods existence is true or does not contain an error unless he assumes that his clear and distinct perception of the steps of his reasoning is correct. But Descartes says in premise 5 that…

Words 291 - Pages 2

The Ontological And Teleological Arguments For The Existence Of God

Existence of God The Ontological and Teleological arguments have multiple similarities and differences in the sense that they both are proving the existence of God, and how God is all powerful; but the major differences are the idea of the proving the existence solely through thought and the proven existence through the physical world and intricate order of nature. The Teleological argument goes more in-depth with its argument of the existence of God by providing more physical proof for people to…

Words 1008 - Pages 5

Rene Descartes Research Paper

experiences and knowledge. Descartes proposition is that only the mind can create certain knowledge and our senses are being attacked by the devil that betray us. Not to mention he is well known for the quote “I think therefore i am” (Descartes n.p) which is one of his main beliefs in philosophy.…

Words 1505 - Pages 7

Rene Descartes Superman Argument

Objection to Descartes Mind/Body separation In this paper, I will examine one of Descartes arguments in Meditation Six, namely his argument for conceivability. I will first restate his argument and outline how it works. I will then raise an objection to his argument in the form of the Clark Kent/Superman argument. The final part of this paper will include reasons why I think that Descartes’ proof is indefensible on the grounds of it being too reliant on arguments without concrete evidence to support…

Words 825 - Pages 4

What was the role of God in the writings of Descartes and Pascal? Essay

What is the role of God in the writings of Descartes and Pascal? Both the idea of God and the existence of God play a major role in the writings of Descartes and Pascal. Both certainly appear to believe in him though they argue the case for his existence very differently and they also give Him a very different sort of role in their works. Whilst Descartes claims that he is certain of the existence of God, using a large part of his Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire la raison, et chercher…

Words 1774 - Pages 8

Essay about Descartes Senses

communicate with the world outside us and even inside our bodies. Descartes in his “Meditations” just pretends that he does not trust his senses to get a new insight in his mind, to make a switch in his custom form of thinking, to look at the world from the new perspective. Even though Descartes says he rejects everything he knew before, he conveniently retains memories of Classical and Medieval philosophy, which he periodically refers to. Descartes thinks he accumulated a lot of questionable and dubious…

Words 1226 - Pages 5

Why Is John Locke Innate Knowledge

Between the beliefs of Descartes and Locke about ideas whether ideas are innate or perceived through experiences, they have many similarities and also many differences. Descartes believes strongly in innate ideas, meaning that our knowledge is given to us. Descartes claims and attempts to explain that we are born with all knowledge we believe that we obtain throughout our lifetime. While Locke doesn’t believes that our ideas our innate, he strongly believes that we learn and come up with ideas through…

Words 977 - Pages 4

Descartes 'Skepticism In Sextus Empiricus'

However, in Meditation I, he takes on a skeptical view on the basis that the senses have deceived him on some occasions. Thus, Descartes conjectures that we cannot be certain of knowledge that is based upon the testimony of our…

Words 1920 - Pages 8