Descartes Self Analysis

Words: 1375
Pages: 6
Open Document
Descartes provides us with the notion of the “self” in his Second Meditation after establishing a plan of radical skepticism. Descartes views the self as the mind, insofar as he believes that he is primarily a “thinking thing”. For the remainder of this essay, the body will be defined as possessing the ability to receive and transmit the senses, as well as being able to interact with the world outside of the mind. I will discuss and judge the merit of the arguments Descartes stands on. Then I will conclude by arguing that the conclusion Descartes comes to cannot be achieved by his own path of logic. Descartes believes that the “self” and the “body” cannot be made of the same “stuff” or serve similar purposes. This stems from his reasoning …show more content…
Here he comes to a junction where he considers the nature of the body and the soul/mind and says that he imagines the soul as an ether that runs throughout the body, but recognizes that he cannot apply qualitative observations to it that suit his sensibilities like he can for the body. By, accepting that he can never be positive about his senses of perception or that the body exists, he realizes it cannot logically be the role of a soul to sustain or nourish the body. He then looks to the notion of imagination and how one must be careful not to invent things with the imagination because they are inherently false. This means that you cannot use imagination to elucidate the true nature of the world, which he would be doing if he imagined the body and soul as anything physical without corroborating evidence. His final thoughts on the subject are that he is having difficulty completely letting go of the idea that the body is known better than the mind, but he knows that it cannot be correct because there is no rationale that allows him to know something which is doubtful such as the body, better than the mind which has survived his skepticism. In Descartes’ mind, the self is something that thinks and exists, but he cannot say the same for the body which he claims does not …show more content…
However, a situation in which that logic falls through is if the demon can cast thoughts onto the Meditator’s mind. He fails to consider the possibility that the mind exists to capture “thought signals” much like an eye which captures light signals. In this scenario, his mind would be a blank slate made only for the demon’s thoughts to be projected on and nothing if the demon was not present. Some may propose that Descartes would then be proved right in the notion that he exists, but would have failed to discern his true nature. Though this is interesting semantics, by his own definitions of existence, Descartes would actively have to be producing his own thoughts, but in this situation, he is merely a tool, just as much as any other inanimate object, and would therefore, most likely not consider himself to be
Show More

Related Documents: Descartes Self Analysis

Essay on Vertigo: René Descartes

as “I think, therefore I am”. But what is the underlying meaning behind ergo sum? Who is the I and who decides whether one thinks or not? Is it possible to not think? These are a few of the many questions that have arisen from Descartes’ complex statement. Descartes spent years questioning himself and everything around him to come to the conclusion that he exists. As a result he found that he could only be sure of his own existence. Chomsky, another rationalist thinker, believed that ideas…

Words 2569 - Pages 11

Essay about The Meditations of René Descartes: Never Believe What You See – I Don’t Mind If I Do

Within Meditations on First Philosophy (1641), René Descartes undertakes the project of developing a new belief system regarding his existence. Descartes begins this project by demolishing his former belief system. Having his trust in the senses eliminated through a process of methodical doubt, Descartes attempts to establish a sound platform, upon which he will build an indubitable foundation for all knowledge. Upon evaluation of the first two meditations, three conditions for establishing this…

Words 2052 - Pages 9

Knowledge: René Descartes and Knowledge Essay

believes that all objects that are inhabited in the material world of senses, which there is an analogous idea what also is inhabited in the minds of humans. Descartes Descartes quotes “ The concepts expressed and distinctions developed ion normal language use gives us insight into patterns of thought and the world of common sense”. Descartes expressed that the human mind can come to a conclusion on how it can know things in the world on its own free will which is basically common sense when an individual…

Words 1690 - Pages 7

The Knowledge of Human Existence: Perception, Empiricism, and Reality An Analysis Contrived Through The Matrix and The Prestige Essay

March 11, 2012 The Knowledge of Human Existence: Perception, Empiricism, and Reality An Analysis Contrived Through The Matrix and The Prestige Movies provide the audience with a unique experience. Not only do they entertain, they allow the audience to explore their own preconceptions. The most vital preconception that movies allow the viewer to explore and interact with is the definition and formation of knowledge. For centuries man has grasped for the true definition of knowledge. In this…

Words 2709 - Pages 11

Kant: Immanuel Kant and Copernican Revolution Kant Essay

knowledge. He said – can I have knowledge of the world that is not just ‘knowledge of the world as it seems to me’? He was asking the question ‘How do we know what we know and what does it mean to know?’ Other philosophers views on knowledge Descartes – the foundation of knowledge is the knowledge of one’s own existence: ‘I think therefore I am.’ – Kant criticised…

Words 392 - Pages 2

finalpsychology assignment done 2728 Essay

knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered as an academic discipline.” (http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/philosophy?q=Philosophy, 2014) Theorists/Philosophers Before 1879 (2.1) Hippocrates (460 BC – 377 BC) René Descartes (1596 - 1650) Charles Darwin (1809- 1882) Hippocrates was a Greek physiologist who believed the mind and soul were in the brain and that the mind and body were separate things that interact, known as dualism. He is also known as being the father…

Words 2825 - Pages 12

Spinoza's Argument For Monism

Spinoza’s argument for monism is notoriously involved: In the opening definitions and axioms and first 14 propositions of book one of his Ethics, Spinoza seeks to prove, not just decisively but geometrically, the existence of God. His substance monism is this God, and the rest of the Ethics is based on it. Rather than tackle the argument in its entirety, I hope to single out a few key propositions and the discussion and objections regarding them. This paper will be roughly divided into two sections…

Words 2327 - Pages 10

Arguments Against Dualism

Critically examine the arguments for and against Dualism (Descartes), Materialism (Ryle and Carruthers), and Vitalism (Anable). In the last analysis, which of these philosophical psychologies are true and why is it true? Dualism was an idea instituted, yet not started, by Rene Descartes. The idea was that our psyche is something other than our physical cerebrum. He did not begin the idea in light of the fact that the Bible shows that we are more than our body and brains. It shows that we have a different…

Words 1930 - Pages 8

Chapter 2 - History of Psychology Essay

human by just replicate from studying of animal Post “enlightenment” Supposed rational Self-interest human Deep divide b/t cognition & emotion Emphasis on individual Post biological revolution & neuroscience Remerging of cognition & emotion Emphasis interdependence b/t individual & group History of psychology moving from deeply to integrating Human Psychology as Mechanistic Processes Descartes: 1600s Body is machine Controlled by hydraulics (fluids) & mechanics (levers) Consistent…

Words 530 - Pages 3

The History of Calculus Essay

integrals and infinite series. When discussing the history of calculus, we often give Newton all the credit for the discovery, however it was actually developed independently by two different men in the seventeenth century, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a self-taught German mathematician, and Isaac Newton, an English scientist. They established the basic principles of calculus, and, with the help of other mathematicians, it was refined using the concept of the limit. Although both men were fundamental in…

Words 662 - Pages 3