Descartes v Hume Essay

Words: 1531
Pages: 7
Open Document
The concept of self identifies the essence of one’s very being. It implies continuous existence having no other exact equal, i.e. the one and only. Whether or not the specific characteristic(s) used to define self are objectively real, i.e. physical attributes, or purely subjective, i.e. imaginary traits, the concept makes distinct one entity from another. Rationalism is the theory that truth can be derived through use of reason alone. Empiricism, a rival theory, asserts that truth must be established by sensual experience: touch, taste, smell, et al. Rene Descartes, a philosopher and rationalist concluded that one self was merely a continuous awareness of one’s own existence; one’s substance was one’s ability to think. On the other …show more content…
While it’s possible to not sense things, it’s impossible not to think. Descartes claims that he is just “a thing which thinks” (Descartes 9). His proof is that he can question his own existence. While he admits many “images are framed by thought, which are tested by the senses” (Descartes 10), he claims that the way we perceive things comes from thinking. To prove his claim, Descartes examined a piece of wax in various forms and submitted that even though it’s physical form may change, one’s understanding of it to be wax was solely a construct of the human mind. The ability to think is undeniable proof of existence and self is an innate idea created by the mind or soul. So self is just a continuous awareness of one’s individual existence. David Hume was an empiricist who believed that knowledge came from the way one’s mind perceived the physical world. He claimed that there was no such thing as an innate idea, which is an idea present in the human mind that was not created through some sort of experience. Hume argued that people perceive the world in two ways – through impressions which are one’s senses and through ideas which are one’s thoughts. Furthermore, Hume claimed that all ideas were formed by sensual experiences, “It must be some one impression that gives rise to every real idea” (Hume 14). Ideas are essentially copies of impressions and there are two ways of repeating impressions, memory and imagination. One can remember impressions and
Show More

Related Documents: Descartes v Hume Essay

Assess The View That Scepticism Is Unintelligible

from a bed rock of certainty. It is therefore a foundationalist approach. Scepticism can be largely divided in to two forms: universal (often referred to as Cartesian) scepticism and the weaker 'academical' (Hume) variety. The former seeks to strip down everything we hold as true. Descartes' classic argument works in three 'waves' up to the arrival of the Brain-in-the-vat (BIV), in which we are all duped by an evil demon and we are no more than brains in a vat, entirely deluded. By this method the…

Words 2226 - Pages 9

Philosophy: Human and Animals Essay

rights. Because if similarity is going to be applied, to be given rights, then a toy robotic dog, computers, and even radios behave in ways that are similar to ways that human beings behave. Descartes argues that the absence of speech in animals could only be explained in animals lacking thought. Descartes was well aware Excerpted from Alan White, Rights (Oxford:Oxford University Press 1984). Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press. that animals produce calls, cries, songs and various…

Words 2394 - Pages 10

Is Neuroscience Relevant in the Free Wi Essay

affect the free will discussion in the future. Before we are able to see the impact of neuroscience on the discussion of free will, we must first look back at the philosophical doctrines that have defined free will and determinism, thus far. 1 Rene Descartes holds that the mind is nonphysical substance. He clearly identifies that mind with consciousness and self-awareness and distinguished this from the brain as the seat of intelligence. Therefore, the separation of mind and body allows dualists to believe…

Words 7284 - Pages 30