Philosophy: Human and Animals Essay

Submitted By Ecardoso
Words: 2394
Pages: 10
Open Document
Professor: Lynn Watts
Philosophy 2306
20 April 2013

On A Defense Of Animal Rights

Animals where one of the first species to walk and live in this world, that we now call Earth. Animals are able to adapt and survive in this world that humans have changed and adapted for human conformities and that now humans claim as theirs, even though animals where the first to live and inhabit this world. Animals are on planet Earth for a purpose but we are not aware of this because we do not have enough knowledge about animals. But that does not mean that the purpose is for us humans to abuse and use them as we please, just for our needs for food and for personal hobbies that include hunting: and for scientific studies that with out consent abuse animals for testing purposes. Animals should be allowed to live free of fear of being captured and to not be removed from their natural habitat that they consider their home or to be brutally killed. Animals should be allowed to live the lives that they please as they please with no fears of being separated from their families. Animals have feelings just like us humans and yes they are capable of feeling pain just like we do. Animals should have the right to be protected from humans that want to cause them any extreme cruelty and hardship. Animals are different species than humans, but just because they are different than human beings does not mean they should not have rights. Morality rules should be applied and respected for all living things.
My arguments are that animals have rights because they are living things thus they have the right to be defended and protected from those who want to cause them any harm or any type of cruelty. Animals should have rights to their lives, they should be able to live freely the way they please and not be held in captivity for human’s entertainment. Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment, or abuse in any way.
II
Those who argue against animal rights argue that animals have no rights because they lack thought process. Alan White maintains that since animals, cannot, for example, claim, assert, or waive right’s, they are not the kind of things that can have rights in the first place. Only a person can have rights, on White’s account. Animals have shown to be similar in imitating some actions like humans. For example monkeys understand that people smoke cigarettes and thus they do the same action when given cigarettes and some have even become addicted to cigarettes just like humans. Also a group of military men where horsing around and where using their guns in front of a monkey and they gave the monkey a gun and the monkey started shooting at them. But the argument is that just because animals have similarities to humans does not automatically give them rights. Because if similarity is going to be applied, to be given rights, then a toy robotic dog, computers, and even radios behave in ways that are similar to ways that human beings behave. Descartes argues that the absence of speech in animals could only be explained in animals lacking thought. Descartes was well aware
Excerpted from Alan White, Rights (Oxford:Oxford University Press 1984). Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press.

that animals produce calls, cries, songs and various gestures that function to express their passions but argued that they never produce anything like declarative speech in which they use words or put together other signs, as we do in order to declare our thoughts to others. Humans grow and develop a stronger mentality and thought process. Animals never grow up enough for any certain sign of thought to be detected in them.
Animals are here for our needs what harms them really does not matter. Animals are here for a reason thus it is okay for humans to use them as ends to our means. So basically what animals feel, really does not matter because they are not human thus they cannot feel the same way that rational
Show More

Related Documents: Philosophy: Human and Animals Essay

Philosophy Essay 3

Adrien Tang 30829139 PHIL 102 – 004 What is philosophy? Philosophical views and their criticism A philosophy is a comprehensive system of ideas about human nature and the nature of the reality we live in. The definition of philosophy varies with different idealists. Socrates identifies philosophy as the will to not just live life, but to constantly question and evaluate it. He believes people should stop living instinctively, like birds that fly south for the winter. Rather, everyone should stop…

Words 2417 - Pages 10

Ethics Of Animal Testing

Introduction: Generation over generation, humans’ health has become more affected and endangered from new complicated diseases that researchers have not discovered yet, despite doing many experiments on animals to detect some cures for those dangerous diseases. The availability of animal testing has advanced medical research of health issues that have not been faced or identified in the past, as there are many undiscovered life-threatening diseases which could have been an act of nature or by accidental…

Words 1395 - Pages 6

Animal Rights Essay

Block 3 Green AP English Language and Compisition Researched Argument 6 November 2013 Animal Rights All over the world millions of animals are subject to extreme suffering for no viable reason. For example in China a species of bears are put through a painful process through which they are “milked” of their bile (Kristof). This bile is used to make homemade remedies that can be used to cure various sicknesses, however while these remedies were vital in the past, today modern science can…

Words 1236 - Pages 5

Against Animal Experimentation Research

sections: against animal experimentation and for animal experimentation. Research Results 1: Against Animal Experimentation This first section will discuss various arguments and issues that go against animal experimentation. This section will be further divided into four main ideas that support this side of the debate. A Moral Philosophy Those who argue against animal experimentation, all have a strong belief in a moral philosophy regarding the rights of all non-human animals. This animal rights position…

Words 1168 - Pages 5

Rhetorical Analysis Of Hitler's Essay 'Nation And Race'

his excerpt essay “Nation and Race” from Mein Kampf (1925), explains his cruel philosophy by which the strong must conquer the weak for the good of the human race. Hitler supports his viewpoint by discussing reasons as to why people should not breed across different levels of superiority such as creating an inferior new generation, lowering the power of the higher race, and regressing of physical and intellectual humans ultimately resulting in sickness. Hitler’s purpose is to persuade his audience…

Words 426 - Pages 2

Analysis Of Timothy Hsiao´s In Defense Of Eating Meat

we do? Life revolves around how we engage in essential tasks, so it must be of some importance. Animal life has moral significance and should be respected. The majority of the human population for example, would refrain from running over an animal in the street if they could safely do so. This consideration towards a creature’s life indicates at least a basic level of the moral significance of animal life. What people eat is important as well as the process of how it became available to them because…

Words 1438 - Pages 6

Phiosophy Term Paper

Tanya Alamilla Philosophy 300 Professor Carboni 19 March 2013 The human search for knowledge and wisdom is something that is acceptable and it is quite often even expected in today’s modern world. It is nothing new that humans seek for truth, understanding, and reason to why things are the way they are and how they came to be. Many people spend years going to school in attempt to master a profession, many others go about the motions trying to figure out their purpose in life. Whichever the…

Words 1382 - Pages 6

White Tiger Balram Halwai Quotes

That’s my whole philosophy in a sentence” (Adiga p.246) is a powerful quote that involves the issues of freedom versus being a slave. The quote states that let animals live like animals, and let humans live like humans, but what does that mean? How can you let animals live like animals, when they are already animals or humans? This quote arises a lot of questions, but I believe with the wording of the quotation, it is stating that there is a certain way to be an animal or a human. There are many…

Words 832 - Pages 4

Essay about answers q2

happiness INCORRECT determining what constitutes the greatest good CORRECT all of the above Instructor Explanation: The answer can be found in section 2.1 of Understanding Philosophy Question 2. Question : According to the video “Meet Your Meat”, which of the following is not true of how animals are slaughtered on factory farms Student Answer: They are driven in extreme weather conditions without food or water They are often still conscious while being slaughtered…

Words 1829 - Pages 8

Essay on Hunting and Sport

Game" by Richard Connell are Rainsford and Zaroff. They are similar in that they both love hunting, but their philosophies about the sport are different. For there are a few main characteristics of the characters that collates there similarities and differences. The two characters are similar because they both have a strong passion for hunting but they are different in their philosophies of the sport. Both Characters enjoy the sport of hunting; for Rainsfords's passion for hunting is very evident…

Words 700 - Pages 3