Double Jeopardy - the 5th Amendment Essay

Words: 1170
Pages: 5
Open Document
Constitutional Law
Unit 8: Double Jeopardy
Jesely Rojas
July 13th, 2010

“The 5th Amendment is an old friend and a good friend, one of the great landmarks in men's struggle to be free of tyranny, to be decent and civilized.”
William O. Douglas

Prepare a paper analyzing why, under certain circumstances, two state trials in two different states for the murder of the same person will not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Also, analyze why, under certain circumstances, a state trial and a federal trial may be held for the murder of the same person without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. As part of this assignment, you should conduct legal research to support your analysis of …show more content…
In a unanimous decision written by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, the Supreme Court upheld the Tenth Circuit's decision based on the distinction made in United States v. Ward between criminal and civil punishments. The Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply to non-criminal penalties, even if the purpose of the penalty is to punish the offenders and deter future offenders. Since the first punishment handed down by the OCC - a Federal Banking Agency, not a court - was not a criminal punishment, the subsequent indictments were upheld. Overruling its 1989 holding in U.S. v. Halper, the court rules that the double jeopardy clause prevents only multiple criminal prosecutions and/or punishments. When only a civil penalty has been imposed, a later criminal prosecution based on the same acts will be allowed. According to Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court considers the double jeopardy clause in the context of a retrial. At his first trial, the defendant was convicted of first-degree murder, but the penalty phase resulted in a hung jury – meaning the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict on whether to sentence the defendant to death or to life in prison – and therefore, a default life sentence was imposed. The defendant then appealed his conviction and won a reversal. At the retrial, the prosecution again won a conviction, but this time, it also won a unanimous verdict for the death
Show More

Related Documents: Double Jeopardy - the 5th Amendment Essay

Supreme Court Case Summary: Barron V. Baltimore

city, which was supposed to fund him $4,500 for property damages, but an appellate court then reversed the award. The US Supreme court ruled in favor of Baltimore, stating that the 5th Amendment does not have to be followed by all states and cities, stating that a person’s property is not excused from the 5th Amendment, which is an example of selective incorporation. Gitlow v. New York Benjamin Gitlow was a socialist who was arrested for spreading copies of a manifesto which called for an establishment…

Words 495 - Pages 2

8th Amendment Research Paper

Section 1:This section violates 8th amendment of the United States Constitution. Specifically, the provision of the section of the Articles or the portion of the Amendment is: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted.” It violates that provision because: section one says that if any football coach abuses a child shall be sentenced to death. However with the 8th amendment in play it stops that from happening. It forbids from any…

Words 625 - Pages 3

The Debate Between The Fourteenth Amendment

There was a huge debate between the whether Fourteenth Amendment was to be applied to the Bill of Rights for the states. This leads to the ideas of total and selective incorporation. Total incorporation is when the Bill of Rights is 100% recognized while selective incorporation is when the Bill of Rights is partially recognized. The federal government had total incorporation while the states had selective. This was when federalism was impeding on the process of incorporation because of most of the…

Words 216 - Pages 1

Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

a citizen of the United States. The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court case is a Supreme Court decision. Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 ruled that an arrested individual in entitled to rights against self-incrimination and an attorney under the 5th and 6th amendments of the United States Constitution. Once the suspect is under arrest, the officer must say something similar to: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. You have a right to…

Words 589 - Pages 3

Civics Study Guide

Percentage for a supreme court decision: 60% 3. Amendment abolishing slavery: 19th amendment 4. Leader of the Senate: Vice president 5. House of Representatives membership: 435 6. Authority allowing Congress to broaden its power: Necessary and Proper clause 7. Article related to the Executive branch: Article II 8. Total number of senators and members of the house: 535 9. Amendments protecting the rights of citizens accused of crimes: 5th, 6th and 8th 10. Right to gather: Freedom of Assembly…

Words 573 - Pages 3

Essay on bill of rights

Maliaka Nelson POS 301 Jonathan Roeder Bill of Rights This essay will focus on what the 1st amendment and how it guarantees freedom to American citizens, and what is most relevant to me. The second section will discuss the significance of the Bill Of Rights and how it works with the U S Democracy for example during election time. The last section will look the process for amending the Constitution and if it is a “fair”. In…

Words 884 - Pages 4

Constitutional Rights Essay

1st- Freedom of Petition 6. 2nd Right to Keep and Bear Arms 7. 4th Freedom from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures 8. 4th Search Warrant Based on Probable Cause 9. 5th Grand Jury Indictment in capital cases 10. 5th Double Jeopardy 11. 5th Self Incrimination 12. 5th Due Process of Law 13. 5th Eminent Domain 14. 6th Right to a Speedy Public Trial 15. 6th Trial by impartial jury where crime was committed 16. 6th Accused must be informed of the nature of the…

Words 9322 - Pages 38

Criminal Procedure Policy Paper

concerned with the state’s power to maintain an orderly society and the rights of citizens and residents to live in freedom from undue government interference with their liberty” (Zalman, 2008, p. 4). The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth amendments are significant in studying criminal procedure. In criminal justice, the criminal procedure is important because it deals with the conflict between order and liberty directly. To understand the friction between order and liberty, Herbert Packer…

Words 1453 - Pages 6

County Of Riverside V. Mclaughin

arrest. A suspect who has hearing w/i 48 hours can still violate Gerstein if he can prove the delay was unreasonable. If the hearing is held after 48 hours, it is presumed to be unreasonable. ( Hurricane Katrina Situation) Dissent: The 4th amendment require a judicial determination of probable cause either before or promptly after arrest. There is no justification in the Common Law or the 4th amend for delay after the administrative steps of the arrest Discussion Points: Do you agree with…

Words 1949 - Pages 8

Essay Constitutions Notes

UNIT 5: The US Constitution I. The Origin of American Government A. English Contributions i. 1215 – The Magna Carta (Great Charter) was signed insuring protection against the absolute power of the monarch. ii. 1628 – The Petition of Right was signed limiting the monarch’s power in many specific ways. iii. 1689 – The English Bill of Rights was produced guaranteeing citizen’s rights and preventing abuses by the monarchs. B. Colonial Contributions i. 1619 – Virginia House of Burgesses…

Words 2198 - Pages 9