Dred Scott Case Summary

Words: 1440
Pages: 6
Open Document
How the Supreme Court Advocated for Segregation.

By 1877, reconstruction had ended. Slowly but surely, states began to pass more laws regarding race and chipped away the gains in civil rights made after the Civil War. By 1890, segregation was firmly in place in both the north and south, originating from local practices and customs that began before the Civil War. In 1883, the court interpreted the 14th amendment as only applying at the federal level, and private institutions were allowed to discriminate based on race.. During this time of segregation’s legal limbo came one of the most important cases of the Supreme Court, Plessy v. Ferguson, which in 1896 effectively established the constitutionality of segregation, sparking a wave of new …show more content…
In 1910, Justice McKenna wrote: “Regulations which are induced by the general sentiment of the community for whom they are made and upon whom they operate, cannot be said to be unreasonable." The Plessy ruling ensured that the US government would not interfere with any rulings made in states, and would uphold racial discrimination. Justice Harlan’s words, proclaiming that “the judgment this day rendered will, in time, prove to be quite as pernicious as the decision made by this tribunal in the Dred Scott Case” would turn out to be true. Although segregation existed before Plessy v. Ferguson, the outcome of the case proved to be a go-ahead by the federal government for the states to fully segregate without worry of retribution. Segregation transformation of American society, fully establishing the position of African Americans as below whites and illustrated how the federal government would not interfere in maintaining the rights of any minority, even by striking down parts of the US constitution. The legacy of segregation, even seventy years after its official end, is nowhere close to over, and …show more content…
"Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)." in the United States Reports. Vol. 163. The. Quoted in “Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)” by Justia. Accessed February 29, 2024. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/163/537/.

Foner, Eric, Kathleen DuVal, and Lisa McGirr. Give Me a Liberty! An American History of the American Civil War. 7th ed. of the book. Vol. 2. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company, 1994. 2023. The.

———. Voices of Freedom: A Documentary History. 7th ed. of the book. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 2023.

Hoffer, William James. Plessy V. Ferguson : Race and Inequality in Jim Crow America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2012.

“Plessy v. Ferguson. I am a sailor." Oyez. Accessed February 29, 2024. https://www.eyes.org/cases/1850-1900/163us537.

“Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)” Justia. Accessed February 29, 2024. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/163/537/.

“Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)." National Archives. February 8, 2022.
Show More

Related Documents: Dred Scott Case Summary

Dred Scott Case Summary

Dred Scott was an African American slave who worked for Dr. John Emerson starting in 1834, whom was a United States surgeon for the army. Scott was moved by his master to a free state from a slave state then to Fort Snelling, which slavery was forbid by the Missouri Compromise. In the midst of that, Scott got married in Fort Snelling before he left there to go back home with his master in 1838. Dred Scott had a family, a wife and two children. For the better for his family, Scott sued the widow of…

Words 561 - Pages 3

Dred Scott Case Summary

textbook mentions the case regarding Dred Scott vs. Sanford. This is one of the biggest cases in history. It was often referred as the “Dred Scott case” In this particular case Dred Scott was considered the plaintiff. Scott was an African-American slave who belonged to John Emerson, they both resided in Missouri. Slavery was permitted in Missouri during this time. This case deals with slave rights. Mr. Emerson decided to move to Illinois, where he then took Scott with him. The case is considered motionless…

Words 294 - Pages 2

Dred Scott Court Case Summary

In the case, Scott had argued that from him living in the free territories of Illinois and Wisconsin from when his enslaver John Emerson stayed in those terrorized he was to be considered free. The case made its way to the Supreme Court where it was declared that Scott was still a slave and African American were not to be considered a national citizen of the United States. It had also ruled…

Words 1595 - Pages 7

Dred Scott V. Emerson Case Summary

slave woman by the name of Harriet Robinson. Shortly after her acquisition, Harriet Robinson and Dred Scott were wed. The couple had been rented out for a few years, ultimately returning to their master’s side in Jefferson Barracks. During this time the Scotts had children; two boys who died in infancy, and two girls. In 1843 John Emerson died, bequeathing all of his possessions to his wife, except for Dred and Harriet who were not mentioned in the will. Mrs. Emerson considered them her property and…

Words 1032 - Pages 5

Dred Scott V. Sanford Case Summary

The case Dred Scott v. Sanford is an important case because it ruled that African Americans were property and could not sue for their freedom. Dred Scott was born into slavery, he lived in Virginia until 1830 where he moved to Missouri. His master was a surgeon in the army and had been station in modern day Minnesota. They moved back to Missouri in 1842 where the master died. Dred Scott who had lived in the North with his master and under the current laws, any slave that lived in the North for more…

Words 224 - Pages 1

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Summary

The Chief Justice Roger Taney decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford case was biased and racist. Before Dred Scott’s ownership was transferred to Sandford, the slave lived in free states and territories as his previous owner, an army officer, got transferred. Within that time, Scott enjoyed some privileges of being free, such as marriage. However, as he had to return to his original state, Missouri, he thought he had the right to enjoy the same liberties he had in Illinois and Wisconsin Territory. Fighting…

Words 355 - Pages 2

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Summary

The Dred Scott v. Sanford case came about when a slave named Dred Scott filed for freedom in Wisconsin territory which was free land. His owner at the time was John Sandford and he refused Dred Scott to file for his freedom. Scott eventually sued Sandford and the case went to the supreme court in 1857. The decision from the supreme court was dred scott was not a citizen and that he was considered…

Words 75 - Pages 1

Dred Scott Vs Stanford Case Summary

The Dred Scott v. Stanford decision, handed down by the Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, abruptly ended the two-day presidential honeymoon of the unlucky bachelor, James Buchanan. This pronouncement was one of the opening paper-gun blasts of the Civil War. Basically, the case was simple. Dred Scott, a black slave, had lived with his master for five years in Illinois and Wisconsin Territory. Backed by interested abolitionists, he sued for freedom on the basis of his long residence on free soil. The…

Words 500 - Pages 2

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Summary

in American legal history, the Dred Scott v. Sanford case remains a significant study to this day. The case centered around Dred Scott, an enslaved African American, who was purchased by army surgeon, John Emerson, entails a decade-long fight for freedom. In a Missouri court, Dred Scott sued for his freedom, after being taken to territories that had outlawed slavery. After years of legal battles, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court which questioned whether Scott was entitled to sue in a federal…

Words 874 - Pages 4

Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Study

Govt 2305 Section Name: Connor Kelln Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) Summary of Facts: Dred Scott v. Sandford was a landmark United States Supreme Court case on US labor law and constitutional law. Dred Scott, an enslaved man who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. In the decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the court denied Scott's request. It held that black people, whose ancestors were imported and sold as slaves, whether…

Words 516 - Pages 3