The Articles of Confederation, which were enacted in 1781, created a centralized government with limited authority, allowing individual states to hold onto most of their power. This setup resulted in economic instability and disagreements between states. The Constitutional Convention was convened in 1787 due to discontent with these flaws, with representatives from 12 states meeting in Philadelphia to create a new constitution. The emerging Constitution established a more powerful national government with distinct divisions and the Electoral College as a compromise for selecting the President. However, even though it holds historical importance, the Electoral College is frequently condemned as an “old-fashioned” system that misrepresents the concept of one person, one vote. This is represented in Doc C. As a result, it should be replaced to implement a more straightforward way of electing the President, which would more accurately represent the desires of the population and improve the democratic credibility of the electoral system.
The Electoral College may lead to a scenario where the candidate with the highest number of electoral …show more content…
Information from previous elections shows that swing states are given more focus and resources by candidates and campaigns in comparison to non-swing states. This is represented in Doc D. The excessive impact of swing states skews the national conversation and policy focus, leading candidates to prioritize swing state issues over those that are critical to the entire country. During the time leading up to elections, candidates dedicate a substantial amount of time and resources to campaigning in swing states such as Ohio and Florida, while often neglecting states that consistently lean towards either the Democratic or Republican