Recorded history teaches people many things. Being the story of what
mistakes others have made and what ideas they have had, it is a very
important learning tool. If people heed the previous happenings, dire
consequences can be avoided, and great concepts can be utilized and built
upon to form better ways of living. Literature is another valuable source
of information; it also illustrates errors in judgment as well as
accomplishments completed through conscientious choices. While literature
provides diverse stories, some true and some not, it offers another avenue
of study—the authors themselves. One of the most famous of these is the
great Greek poet Homer, who is credited with the writing of the Iliad and
the Odyssey. Very little provable information has been unearthed about this
man, but several theories have been put forth. Speculations concerning
Homer’s life, his characteristics, and his works furnish further
fascination for his readers.
Although Homer’s life span has been thought to be somewhere around the
eighth and seventh centuries B.C.E. (Briggs 220), all historians do not
agree. Some believe that he could have lived around 1200 B.C.E. (Magill.
989). Homer’s birthplace also remains in dispute; seven different cities
lay claim to this honor. All of these cities are located in an area that
the Greeks call Ionia, which is on the western coast of Asia Minor and “was
heavily settled by Greek colonists. It does seem likely that he
Shaffer2
came from this area” since “the Iliad contains several accurate
descriptions of natural features of the Ionian landscape” (Lawall 114). The
fullest account of Homer’s life comes from the city of Heroditus, but this
account and others “seem to be made up of conjecture and tradition” from
his two epic poems (Magill 989). Most scholars think Homer must have lived
in Ionia around the eighth and seventh centuries B.C.E. This seems to be
the most logical answer, but logic often falls short of truth; unless new
evidence surfaces, the world will never know when and where this man lived.
Homer’s characteristics are also questionable: “The Greeks believe
that Homer was blind” because the bard in the Odyssey was blind (Lawall
114). “Most of the early accounts agree that Homer was,” as the Greeks
believe, blind, but also elderly and poor (Magill 989). These early
accounts also lead people to believe that he “wandered from city to city in
ancient Greece” (Magill 989). Some scholars do not believe that Homer could
provide so much description in his works if he could not see. He describes
the settings so vividly that the theory of blindness seems absurd to some.
A modern theory implies that Homer could not read or write; it states that
“blindness is the perfect metaphor for this condition” (Briggs 220). But if
this is true, Homer would have had to dictate his works to someone who was
literate. As for being elderly, it is hard to say, but if Homer was so
well-traveled, it is feasible that he was an older man since traveling in
that era was very slow and took much time. Most people can believe that
Homer was poor because artists were always impoverished. Blind, elderly,
poor, and illiterate or not, nothing can be said for certain.
Shaffer3
Homer’s works, the Iliad and the Odyssey, likewise come under
scrutiny. There are two main theories about his works. The first is that
Homer was an actual person who either wrote the Iliad and the Odyssey or
merely copied them after years of oral recitation. “The texts of the epics
reveal that they were created in an oral culture” (Briggs 221).