By taking away birth right citizenship there would have to be several reforms on the laws and a repeal of the whole 14th amendment and that’s the least of the problems. If birthright citizenship would be abolished then it would also put a burden on all U.S. citizens. This is because they would no longer be able to prove their citizenship easily and inexpensively. The bigger problems are that immigrants actually help the economy more than hurt it and this would just make it difficult on the U.S. to enforce this rule. Also finding and keeping track of all the documentation would just make it more difficult on the U.S.
When immigrants come over to the U.S they usually only come over for a certain reasons. According to the New York Times Should Birthright be abolished “Immigrants come over to the U.S. to work, to reunite with family, to flee persecution, and to create a better life.” Therefore if they are coming over for work, this is going to help the United States economy. That’s because every new job created gives the worker money to shop at a local store. So with new jobs, this means the store is hiring and others are not trying to take your place and money stays in constant circulation.
If birthright citizenship would be abolished, that means that the legitimacy …show more content…
This would actually have the opposite affect that they wanted, I know this because according to New York Times Should Birthright be abolished it states “Eliminating Birthright citizenship would actually increase the number of people living in the U.S. without authorization.’ This is because when an “illegal” baby would be born they would not be born with a legal status in the U.S. The result of this would be a higher population of native-born noncitizens. So in turn, the abolishment of this law would hurt rather than help the people who supported