Later, the case was reviewed and “The Court reasoned that because the possession of a sawed-off double barrel shotgun does not have a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia.” There have been multiple other cases similar to this, not all were about firearms though, for example, the Caetano vs. Massachusetts. In the case, Jamie Caetano was convicted of carrying a stun gun. She appealed to the court saying she was carrying it out of self-protection, especially from her abusive ex-boyfriend. The Massachusetts Supreme Court said that the second amendment doesn’t permit her to carry a stun gun. The US Supreme Court’s final decision was that Jamie’s right to carry a stun gun was following the second amendment due to the fact that the amendment also assured the rights of future, not at the time existent, weapons. A recent case from 2008, the District of Columbia vs. Heller, challenged the Second Amendment. In District of Columbia, it is a crime to carry an unregistered firearm and handgun registration is prohibited. But, the police chief is allowed to give a 1-year license which allows the officer to keep it in their home. Respondent Heller was a D.C. police man who applied for a permit but was