Ethical Arguments Against Eugenics

Words: 735
Pages: 3

EUGENICS
A question raised by biochemistry student Grace Farley proposed the idea that the idea of Eugenics might not be as negative as it’s name brings to the minds of many people. Farley wrote ‘if germ line editing is helping people alleviate the risks of passing along harmful alleles in their gametes, then is it eugenics?’ The idea of the eugenics slippery slope is one of the most significant arguments against gene editing of somatic cells. People who argue against gene editing suggest that a slippery slope could form where by designer babies would be made from genetically manipulated in order for them to have what parents, and society, consider to be ‘genetically ideal.’

The oxford dictionary defines eugenics as ‘the science
…show more content…
Whilst everyone has an idea of what they consider to be ideal, sometimes based on societal norms, what could be considered as ideal now could change quite dramatically over the next decades and centuries. Therefore, Caplan and Magnus were prescient in their thinking that ‘There is nothing terrible about subjectivity in a decision to indulge preferences about the traits of one's child as long as those preferences do nothing to hurt or impair the …show more content…
- TRIED TO CREATE THE PERFECT AYRAN RACE!
SAYING THAT PEOPLE WHO HAVE THIS GROUP OF CONDITIONS ARE NOT WORTH IT!
Adolf Hitler represented the extreme end of the negative eugenics argument that he applied to the ideology that non-Aryan people were inferior. His beliefs lead to the holocaust and the catastrophic loss of more than six million people. Many people who argue against the idea of gene editing suggest that should gene editing begin then it could potentially develop to become something akin to the holocaust. Through the manipulation of genes in order to be considered ‘genetically ideal,’ anti editors argue that society would begin to shun those who would not be perfect, and thus leading to an unequal