First, Socrates challenges Euthyphro that inherent within divine obedience comes an inherent lack of respect for parents, something of which Douglas Linder, author of The Trial of Socrates, calls “The ultimate command of divine law is unconditional respect for parents.” (Linder, 2002, p. 2) Socrates also maintains that an adherence to the gods does not necessarily mean that this adherence must also satisfy man, thereby telling Euthyphro that his interpretation of divine law compelling prosecution of the wrongdoer no matter whom he might be is faulty at best. (Jowett, …show more content…
And, as Socrates suggests, would not piety require a misplaced sense of submission if anything else? He states, “…piety excludes moral excellence in the sense of ancient virtue ethics. Piety would be then something like a blind obedience to the capricious dictates of the gods, whereas morality requires autonomous decision making and free use of critical intelligence.” (Jowett, 1868, p. 14) In other words, to hold true to piousness, or