Another example of peaceful resistance being negative is Gandhi's peaceful protest in March of 1930. This protest was based on the taxation the British put on salt. It was called the "Salt March." The British repeatedly used force to stop salt production from the seawater of in the coastal village of Dandi. Although the people in the march were peaceful, the British used force which was violent. My point is, peaceful resistance could be a good thing, but the authorities are not going to react nonviolently. People are killed every day for disobeying the law. I believe that civil disobedience is not an attack on our laws, but a way to give the people a voice. It is not right to break the law, but they must be heard somehow. For example, Martin Luther King Jr., was a very inspiring minister who sometimes disobeyed the law. He did not disobey it to be hateful, he disobeyed it to take a stand. Sometimes, people aren't disobeying for this same reason. Martin was always peaceful, he didn't believe in fighting the law with fists or guns, he believed in fighting with his voice. Malcolm X, was the complete opposite. Yet, both men were