Explain Why Pitbulls Should Not Be Banned

Words: 639
Pages: 3

Imagine this:You are enjoying time with your dog of a breed of pitbull.Suddenly you find out that your pitbull has been banned from your city.You want to keep your dog but you don't have the money to live somewhere else.You are even more upset because you just got the dog for lots of money.Because of dog bites,waste of money,safety pitbull should not be banned.To begin, There is no evidence BSL makes communities safer.According to Procon.org“People who are breeding or training dogs for illegal fighting or to protect illegal activities banned. The snares are not allowed. For example, following a 2005 pit bull ban in Council Bluff, Iowa, Boxer and Labrador Retriever bites increased, as did overall dog bites.”When pitbull were banned in many places Labrador Retriever bites increased so did dog bites so if there were …show more content…
Also, according to procon.org”The ASPCA also notes chaining and tethering dogs outside, lack of obedience training, and selective breeding for protection or fighting are risk factors for dog attacks.”This shows that it is not the breed, it is how the dogs are treated. Another reason to not ban pitbull is because BSL is expensive to enact.According to procon.org”BSL would cost $476 million each year, also enforcement of the law.There are 4.5 million dog bites each year in total of 40 deaths, making each death $11.9 million for taxpayers.”This shows that even when pitbull were banned there was a lot of dog bites and very expensive for each death. Other evidence from procon.org states”BSL would cost $476 million each year, also enforcement of the law.There are 4.5 million dog bites each year in total of 40 deaths, making each death $11.9 million for taxpayers.”This shows that even when pitbull were banned there was a lot of dog bites and very expensive for each