Eyewitness In Qualitative Research

Words: 908
Pages: 4

Describe some of the factors that tend to make recollection unreliable
In cognitive psychology, recollection refers to when someone recalls of a specific event from his episodic memory. However, there are some cases where the recollection of memory is unreliable. It is important to consider such cases because the unreliable recollection results into undesirable consequences in certain situations. For instance, the eyewitness testimony is testable evidence which I given in a court of law by an individual who witnesses a specific event in relation to the criminal cases. According to the innocence project (1992), it was revealed that 75% of cases with wrong convictions were due to the false memory given in eyewitness accounts. Numerous psychological
…show more content…
This occurs when an individual engages in social interaction with another person. The desire to construct a shared narrative version of events can lead to major memory distortions. According to Gabbert et al (2003), it was found that the opportunity to construct a shared version of events led to significant levels of distortion in the final recalls. In this experiment, two different versions of video (some details were different). The recollections from participants who watched the video and shared some ideas with participants from another group were unreliable. On the other hand, participants who watched the video in isolation made relatively reliable recollection. This findings suggest that sharing ideas can distort the …show more content…
However, recollection of memory can be influenced at the stage of retrieval. Loftus (1975) was interested in the effects of leading questions. In her experiment, participants were shown a shot clip where two cars crashed each other. Participants were randomly assigned into 5 conditions and they were asked different leading questions. The question was that ‘what is the estimated speed when the car was ‘smashed’ each other?’. The word ‘smashed’ was replaced with other words including ‘hit’, ‘contacted ‘, ‘collided’. It was found that participants estimated the highest speed when they heard the sentence with the word, smashed. In contrast, participants estimated the lowest speed when they heard the word, contacted. These findings showed that recollection of memory can be distorted even at the stage of retrieval. However, the overall criticism on psychological findings on memory is that the experiment is not ecologically valid. In other words, the procedures are different from the real life settings, thus it is difficult to generalise to the real life situations. For example, the participants in Loftus study (1975) might have provided unreliable recollection with leading questions because participants, especially university students, do not often estimate the speed of car. This suggests that the manipulation of variables in the procedures should be more