Famine: Morality and Singer Essay

Submitted By jimmyp1

Words: 380

Pages: 2

Open Document

“Famine, Affluence, and Morality” name PHI208 Ethics and Moral Reasoning instructor date

Peter Singer’s goal in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality was to convince people that the people as well as the governments should help with famine relief, primarily in East Bengal. Peter Singer wanted to let everyone know that the way that they deal with disasters is "morally unjustified".
Mr. Singer’s three counter-arguments I think are that people from Bengali are far removed from people in the developed world. Singer argues that many other places need money, so why not give to this charity. Singer states that we would have to completely revise "our moral scheme" to give reason for providing aid until the principle of marginal utility "kicked in" to replace his first principle of responsibility to help famine sufferers. According to Singer you have to donate until you can't afford to without losing something that has an equal moral value to you as the lives of strangers. Singer states that the value of every life is the same.
Marginal utility could be defined as the point where by giving more one would cause as much suffering as the actual suffering people that we are trying to help. This relates to Singer’s argument by giving an example of how Singer states that thi can be accomplished.
When Singer speaks of duty and charity, he states that it is our duty to provide charity. In today’s society, we usually leave our charity to those closest to us. Not many people

Peter Singer Famine Affluence And Morality

Peter Singer, an Australian moral philosopher, opposes to the way people perceive and deal with poverty, famine and the sufferance of the less fortunate. In his essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, he argues that we are failing to perform our moral duties insofar as we live lives of relative luxury while others are suffering and dying due to diseases, famine. He believes that it’s possible to reduce the pain and the sufferance of people and to avoid it if we give up our nonessentials. He states…

Words 696 - Pages 3

Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer

because it seemed really daunting. So far in my life, I never had to write a specific number of pages for a paper. The expectation of writing “five” page was overwhelming. To start, I read the essay that was wrote by Peter Singer. Which was called Famine, Affluence and Morality. Though I understood what he was saying I disagreed with him. After reading I start to write my introduction and form a thesis for my paper. Afterwards, for better understanding of the material, I started researching about…

Words 164 - Pages 1

Famine, Affluence And Morality: The 1970s Peter Singer

During the 1970s Peter Singer wrote Famine, Affluence and Morality, which covered Singer’s thoughts on how we should treat those starving in poverty stricken countries. He outlined what John Arthur later called the greater moral evil rule. That is we should do everything we can to stop something bad from happening “without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance.” Taken at its strongest degree this would mean giving away everything you have until you are only just better off than those…

Words 151 - Pages 1

Peter Singer Famine Analysis

The difference between duty and charity was made clear in Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” as he strongly argued people living in developed countries should be morally obligated to support people who are suffering. This paper will focus on Singer’s main argument and principles, the correct course of action felt by Singer to defeat poverty and the implications welfare consequentialism encounters when demanded on wealthy societies. Singer’s core argument contained two principles that…

Words 870 - Pages 4

Peter Singer's Argument Analysis

requires the use of several premises and a single conclusion. Premise 1 states “that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad” (“Famine, Affluence, and Morality” 231). The negative effects of starvation (e.g., suffering and death) are major evils which could be reduced, if not averted in its entirety. Singer is largely unconcerned with defending the validity of this premise as he believes most people will accept the notion as it stands. Though uncontroversial when…

Words 1505 - Pages 7

P. Singer Essay

Peter Singer-“Famine, Affluence, and Morality” In the article, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” written by Peter Singer, he elaborates on his views of the East Bengal emergency that took place in 1971. This assignment will discuss Singer’s goal and arguments supporting his position. Provide three counter-arguments addressed by Singer. Define his concept of marginal utility and how it relates to his argument. Then, explain how the ideas of duty and charity are different in Singer’s proposed…

Words 1018 - Pages 5

PHI 208 Week 2 assignment Essay

Famine, Affluence, and Morality PHI 208 Ethics and Moral Reasoning Famine, Affluence, and Morality In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and…

Words 1306 - Pages 6

Peter Singer Famine Summary

In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer argues the manner in how people in affluent countries react towards those in need. Our traditional moral categories of duty and charity have diminished during time and we also view a deficiency in food, shelter, and poverty. Singer explains the insufficient moral responsibility of people and assumes that a lack of food causes starvation and family deaths are a form of suffering as well. As we all know, suffering is morally wrong; and these premises…

Words 1570 - Pages 7

Influence Famine And Morality Analysis

In response to Peter Singer’s “Affluence, Famine, and Morality” Richard Arneson wrote "What Do We Owe Distant Needy Strangers?" In a short paragraph from this article Arneson states a view of common-sense when dealing with the problems discussed in Singer’s article. The common-sense view is simply a thought process that one should help others regardless of distance. But Arneson also says that the help “does not include any quantification of the extent.” So it would be safe to say that Arneson is…

Words 189 - Pages 1

World Hunger and Our Responsibilities Essay

McCullough PHI 200 Mind and Machine Week 2 Assignment Instructor: Jack Isbell September 24, 2012 In the article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” author Peter Singer believes that people who are wealthy should not spend money on unneeded objects while there are people starving in the world. Singer believes that people who are able to give money to the less fortunate, poverty and half-starving should do it to help them escape being poor. He also states…

Words 722 - Pages 3