Peter Singer Famine Affluence And Morality

Words: 696
Pages: 3
Open Document
Peter Singer, an Australian moral philosopher, opposes to the way people perceive and deal with poverty, famine and the sufferance of the less fortunate. In his essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, he argues that we are failing to perform our moral duties insofar as we live lives of relative luxury while others are suffering and dying due to diseases, famine. He believes that it’s possible to reduce the pain and the sufferance of people and to avoid it if we give up our nonessentials. He states that it’s morally wrong if we don’t try to prevent these deaths, because we have these luxuries that if we give up, we can make a meaningful impact on the lives we save.
Singer begins by assuming that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad”. This sets the floor for his second principle which is If one can prevent something bad without sacrificing something of comparable moral worth, then one ought to do so. In this context, “ought” means that if you don't do so then you are doing something morally wrong. This principle required not only that we give up everything which is a luxury but we give up everything up to what we make the point of marginal utility.
He implements his …show more content…
In other words, they see it as an act of generosity, an act that they should be thanked for. Therefore, they think that if they decide not to give they shouldn’t be condemned for it. However, Singer disagrees with this. He believes that giving is different form charity and shouldn’t be considered as "supererogatory". Unlike charity, “we ought to give the money away, and it is wrong not to do so.” Singer believes that it is our moral duty to give up the life or relative luxury to help those suffering from diseases, lack of resources, famine etc. He argues that giving is a duty and not an act of charity therefor we ought to do it regardless of the distance and the number of people who are taking
Show More

Related Documents: Peter Singer Famine Affluence And Morality

Famine, Affluence And Morality By Peter Singer

because it seemed really daunting. So far in my life, I never had to write a specific number of pages for a paper. The expectation of writing “five” page was overwhelming. To start, I read the essay that was wrote by Peter Singer. Which was called Famine, Affluence and Morality. Though I understood what he was saying I disagreed with him. After reading I start to write my introduction and form a thesis for my paper. Afterwards, for better understanding of the material, I started researching about…

Words 164 - Pages 1

Famine, Affluence And Morality: The 1970s Peter Singer

During the 1970s Peter Singer wrote Famine, Affluence and Morality, which covered Singer’s thoughts on how we should treat those starving in poverty stricken countries. He outlined what John Arthur later called the greater moral evil rule. That is we should do everything we can to stop something bad from happening “without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance.” Taken at its strongest degree this would mean giving away everything you have until you are only just better off than those…

Words 151 - Pages 1

Famine: Morality and Singer Essay

“Famine, Affluence, and Morality” name PHI208 Ethics and Moral Reasoning instructor date Peter Singer’s goal in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality was to convince people that the people as well as the governments should help with famine relief, primarily in East Bengal. Peter Singer wanted to let everyone know that the way that they deal with disasters is "morally unjustified". Mr. Singer’s three counter-arguments I think are that people from Bengali are far removed…

Words 380 - Pages 2

Peter Singer's Argument Analysis

Peter Singer’s argument on international aid requires the use of several premises and a single conclusion. Premise 1 states “that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad” (“Famine, Affluence, and Morality” 231). The negative effects of starvation (e.g., suffering and death) are major evils which could be reduced, if not averted in its entirety. Singer is largely unconcerned with defending the validity of this premise as he believes most people will accept the notion…

Words 1505 - Pages 7

World Hunger and Our Responsibilities Essay

McCullough PHI 200 Mind and Machine Week 2 Assignment Instructor: Jack Isbell September 24, 2012 In the article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” author Peter Singer believes that people who are wealthy should not spend money on unneeded objects while there are people starving in the world. Singer believes that people who are able to give money to the less fortunate, poverty and half-starving should do it to help them escape being poor. He also states…

Words 722 - Pages 3

P. Singer Essay

Peter Singer-“Famine, Affluence, and Morality” In the article, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” written by Peter Singer, he elaborates on his views of the East Bengal emergency that took place in 1971. This assignment will discuss Singer’s goal and arguments supporting his position. Provide three counter-arguments addressed by Singer. Define his concept of marginal utility and how it relates to his argument. Then, explain how the ideas of duty and charity are different in Singer’s proposed…

Words 1018 - Pages 5

Influence Famine And Morality Analysis

In response to Peter Singer’s “Affluence, Famine, and Morality” Richard Arneson wrote "What Do We Owe Distant Needy Strangers?" In a short paragraph from this article Arneson states a view of common-sense when dealing with the problems discussed in Singer’s article. The common-sense view is simply a thought process that one should help others regardless of distance. But Arneson also says that the help “does not include any quantification of the extent.” So it would be safe to say that Arneson is…

Words 189 - Pages 1

Is it a Developed Country's Moral Duty to Assist Poorer Nations? Essay

1600 words Hunger and diseases related to malnutrition, subsequently direct consequences of poverty, have caused 45% of deaths in children under five; 3.1 million children each year, and around 8,500 children per day (The Hunger Project, 2014). Peter Singer would argue that morally, it is vital that residents of developed countries provide their services to benefit the poor. If it is in the power of a nation to provide services towards remedying poverty and hunger, such as charity or other kinds of…

Words 1696 - Pages 7

Essay on Morality: Morality and Christal Anderson Phi 208

Christal Anderson PHI208: Ethics and Moral Reasoning Julie Pedersen Peter Singer September 30, 2013 Singer’s overall goal was to inform us about things that we can help contribute to. He was trying to explain the morality of the world. For example he stated, “The decisions and actions of human beings can prevent this kind of suffering. Unfortunately, human beings have not made the necessary decisions. At the individual level, people have, with very few exceptions, not responded to the situation…

Words 1085 - Pages 5

Greed Vs. Morality

Peter Singer’s Ethics Reviewed PHI 103 Informal Logic Instructor Mark Balto November 17, 2014 Greed versus Morality Singer’s article, famine, affluence, and morality uncover the reality of a person’s choice of greed or morals. The premise is a child in a shallow pond in distress with no parent or guardian in sight. An adult witnesses this distress and has to decide between ruining his/her expensive shoes and saving the child. This dilemma for most is simple, rescue the child. However…

Words 354 - Pages 2