Freedom Of Speech Vs Hate Speech

Words: 1376

Pages: 6

Open Document

Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right however not all expressions are protected by this right. Toby Mendel, the executive director for Centre for Law and Democracy explains, “It is not an absolute right, and it may be limited to protect overriding public and private interests, including equality and public order” (Hate Speech Rules Under International Law). An example of expression that is not protected is hate speech. Speech is considered hate speech based on three key aspects. These aspects are intent of exciting hatred, incitement, and context. Also hate speech can be words or images. Hate speech is also very complex and unique because it is greatly disputed all over the world about what is considered hate speech, what is not, and how …show more content…
This magazine was not seen as hate speech though because France abolished its old laws that made blasphemy a crime. Another example of this was reported by the New Yorker. In this article Stille explained how actress Brigitte Bardot was convicted and fined for writing that French Muslims were destroying our country. During this same time writer Michel Houellebecq was acquitted of his charges for saying Islam is the stupidest religion. Stille explains, “Bardot was clearly directing hostility toward Muslim people, and was thus found guilty, while Houellebecq was criticizing their religion, which is blasphemous, but not a crime, in France” ( Alexander Stille, New Yorker). This is an example of how complex hate-speech laws in France can be and how some content is considered a crime, while others are not. Dieudonné was not the only criminalized after the Charlie Hebdo attack. According to the NY Daily News, 54 people were also arrested, “…for posting about or spewing hate speech, anti-Semitism or glorifying terrorism” (Sasha

Freedom Of Speech: Schenck Vs United States

How important is freedom of speech? What about National security? Is one more important than the other? Is there some type(s) of speech that are dangerous and should it be restricted? I firmly believe that we should have our right to freedom of speech. So, no, I don’t think it should be restricted. However, that doesn't mean free speech can be used as an excuse to validate other behavior. With this said, I still think that security is more important than freedom. Arresting those protesting on private…

Words 1096 - Pages 5

Aung San Suu Kyi and Suu Kyi Speech Essays

Aung San Suu Kyi Speech – Comments Aung San Suu Kyi’s speech addresses big universal issues yet she starts in a very personal way, reflecting on her own experience as a democratically elected leader who has lived over six years under house arrest. This delicate balance between personal reflection and meditation and more abstract, generalised reasoning continues through the speech. Her surface message is that women can and must play a bigger part in social and political decision-making throughout…

Words 1039 - Pages 5

Tinker Vs Des Moines Case Study

The case of Tinker vs. Des Moines was a case that went down in history as an example of how dissension due to a misreading of an amendment can be dealt with. The Supreme Court decided in the end that the school was right in their actions to ban the arm bands, but they agreed with the students that the First Amendment does include symbolic speech. However, my fellow lawyer, Amanda, and I disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision on the basis of the truths of scripture and the morals and conscience…

Words 1001 - Pages 5

John Stuart Mill Research Paper

ability to act? 2. Freedom of action: When can society legitimately interfere? 3. Liberty of Thought & Discussion: how much? Reasons? (3-1/2 reasons) 4. Individuality %%%%%%% Why study Mill? What does he add to Classical Liberalism? utilitarian value of liberty for individual, society; Why is individual liberty important? what is the social value of individual or eccentric opinions and actions, even when opinions are vile? Mill starts from a position of complete individual freedom; one must justify…

Words 2655 - Pages 11

Flag Burning In The Texas Vs. Johnson Cases

Burning the American flag is said to be protected by the first amendment. Burning the flag is seen as freedom of speech and protest. The very act of burn the American flag in protest is a hate crime and the very opposite of what the flag stands for. The decision that flag burning is constitutional was decided by the Supreme Court during the Texas VS. Johnson case in 1989. This decision was wildly controversial to this day could be overturned by the Supreme Court in a revote. Gregory Lee Johnson…

Words 525 - Pages 3

case study, Albert Anyder, Petitioner vs Fred W Phelps Essays

GVT 111 Case Study: Albert Snyder, Petitioner VS Fred W Phelps In the Albert Snyder, Petitioner, VS Fred W. Phelps case argued October 6th, 2010 the court came to a decision that tort liability on Westboro for intentional infliction of emotional distress must be set aside. I strongly disagree with the majority opinion for many reasons. The first being that Snyder alleged five state tort law claims: defamation, publicity given to private life, intentional of emotional distress, intrusion upon…

Words 901 - Pages 4

Freedom of Speech in the Philippines Essay

FREEDOM OF SPEECH / EXPRESSION Freedom of speech is the concept of the inherent human right to voice one's opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment. "Speech" is not limited to public speaking and is generally taken to include other forms of expression. The right is preserved in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is granted formal recognition by the laws of most nations. Nonetheless the degree to which the right is upheld in practice varies greatly from…

Words 2709 - Pages 11

Discrimination Against Jim Crow Laws

Throughout most of American history, blacks were not treated equally compared to the whites. During the beginning years of America, blacks were brought from Africa and were used as slaves. While most nations outlawed slavery, America still continued with using slaves because it was free labor. It was not until the end of the Civil War on 1865 did slaves become free by the thirteenth amendment; the thirteenth amendment abolished slavery in America. The 13th amendment, however, did not abolish discrimination…

Words 1852 - Pages 8

Mlk vs Malcolm X Essay

Martin vs. Malcolm Ambitious, Strong, Intelligent, Evolving; are all great terms to describe the two most famous men in the Civil Rights –“Black Power” movement. Martin and Malcolm, both are very different people yet so similar; fighting for the same aspirations but on two completely different battlegrounds. They both had the same goal of extinguishing racism. Yet both had their own philosophies and beliefs they followed and they both gave inspiring and moving speeches, but portrayed in two different…

Words 2914 - Pages 12

Relgion vs. the Constitution Essay

Comp 1 Mrs. Baker October 5, 2014 Religion vs. The Constitution Laws are put in place to keep peace and justice among us, but is there certain a time when breaking the law is the right thing to do Since the beginning of time, good people have broken laws to make changes for the better. In 1955, Rosa Parks, an elderly black female refused to give up her seat on a bus to a selfish young white man. Although she was arrested, she took a big step for equal rights. Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested…

Words 997 - Pages 4